Fed’s Nightmare: CPI Inflation in Services Reheats (not tariffed), while Inflation in Durable Goods, Apparel & Footwear (tariffed) Remains Cool

While pundits looked with their magnifying glasses for tariffs in consumer goods prices, it was in services, which are not tariffed, where inflation took off again. Shocker? No

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

The shocker was the re-acceleration of inflation in services. Services are not tariffed. They include housing costs, medical care, health insurance, auto insurance, subscriptions; telephone, internet, and wireless services; lodging, rental cars, education, movies, concerts, sports events, club memberships, public transportation, water, sewer, trash collection, motor vehicle maintenance and repair, etc. And that’s where inflation re-accelerated.

While the pundits out there were busy searching with their magnifying glasses for signs that tariffs are getting pushed into consumer goods prices, it was in services – especially non-housing core services – where inflation took off again.

Inflation in durable goods (including new vehicles), apparel, and footwear, which catch a substantial part of the tariffs, barely budged, with new vehicle prices dropping, as automakers ate all of the tariffs because they could not pass them on because demand in June was already weak, and what was needed was incentives that translate into price cuts – and we already knew that from their earnings warnings.

But the re-acceleration of inflation in services, especially non-housing services, was just one more nasty surprise that inflation tends to dish up.

Core services without housing jumped by 0.38% in June from May (+4.6% annualized), the worst increase since January. None of these services are tariffed.

The six-month average accelerated to 4.2% (red in the chart). So that’s a worrisome development.

Core services with housing also accelerated. They’re the biggest component of CPI, accounting for nearly two-thirds of overall CPI. They rose by 0.25% in June from May (+3.1% annualized). Housing costs also accelerated in June from May; more in a moment.

The six-month core services CPI rose by 3.2%, same as in May.

Durable goods prices barely budged, inching up 0.09% (+1.1% annualized) in June from May, and year-over-year were up just 0.6%.

The durable goods CPI had spiked by 25% during the free-money era. Then in mid-2022, prices declined for two years (negative CPI), but from September 2024, prices inched up again through January, and since then have been roughly flat.

This chart shows the price index, not the percentage change. It clarifies just how violently prices spiked during the free-money era, how they declined for two years, and how they’ve inched higher from the low point last fall.

Apparel and footwear are also tariffed if imported, and much of it is imported. The CPI for apparel and footwear rose by 0.4% month-to-month, undoing the equal drop in May, with no price change over the two-month period.

Year-over-year, the CPI for apparel and footwear declined by 0.5% (deflation).

The chart shows the price level (not the percentage change). So prices remain below where they’d been for the last nine months in 2024.

So far, companies have eaten the tariffs because prices are already high from the 2020-2022 burst of inflation, when consumers were willing to pay whatever, and companies made record huge profits; for now, consumers are not willing to pay whatever again. Raise prices and they will not come.

The overall CPI rose by 0.29% (+3.5% annualized) in June from May, a sharp acceleration, and the biggest month-to-month increase since January (blue in the chart), driven by services and energy (natural gas, electricity, and gasoline).

The 3-month CPI jumped by 2.4% annualized, the highest since March.

The 6-month CPI rose by 2.5% annualized, a deceleration of the prior months (red in the chart).

“Core” CPI, which excludes food and energy components to track underlying inflation, accelerated to +0.23% in June from May (+2.8% annualized).

The 6-month “core” CPI rose by 2.7% annualized, a slight acceleration from May (red).

Major components of CPI, year-over-year price changes:

  • Overall CPI: +2.7% (yellow), a sharp acceleration from May, the second acceleration in a row, and the biggest increase since February, despite a year-over-year drop in energy prices.
  • Core CPI +2.9% (red), an acceleration from May.
  • Core Services CPI: +3.6% (blue), an acceleration from May.

Housing components of core services.

Owners’ Equivalent of Rent CPI accelerated to +0.30% (+3.7% annualized) in June from May.

The three-month average decelerated to +3.8% annualized, still a faster pace than late last year.

OER indirectly reflects the expenses of homeownership: homeowners’ insurance, HOA fees, property taxes, and maintenance. It’s the only measure for those expenses in the CPI. It is based on what a large group of homeowners estimates their home would rent for, with the assumption that a homeowner would want to recoup their cost increases by raising the rent.

As a stand-in for homeowners’ expenses, OER accounts for 26.2% of overall CPI and estimates inflation of shelter as a service for homeowners.

Rent of Primary Residence CPI accelerated a hair to +0.23% (+2.75% annualized) in June from May, after the sharp deceleration in May.

The 3-month rate decelerated to +3.2% annualized, the lowest since August 2021.

Rents are no longer the driver of services inflation – the drivers are now in other services summarized by the “core services CPI without housing” in the first chart above.

Rent CPI accounts for 7.5% of overall CPI. It is based on rents that tenants actually paid, not on asking rents of advertised vacant units for rent. The survey follows the same large group of rental houses and apartments over time and tracks the rents that the current tenants, who come and go, pay in rent for these units.

Year-over-year, OER rose by 4.2%, same increase as in May, and still substantially higher than before the pandemic (red in the chart below).

Rent CPI (blue in the chart below) rose by 3.8%. It is now back in the same range as before the pandemic.

The historically unusual situation of the OER running hotter than rent CPI may be due to the surging costs of homeowner’s insurance, which homeowners may be taking into consideration when estimating how much their home would rent for.

The table below shows the major categories of “core services.” Combined, they accounted for 64% of total CPI:

Major Services ex. Energy Services Weight in CPI MoM YoY
Core Services 64% 0.3% 3.6%
Owner’s equivalent of rent 26.2% 0.3% 4.2%
Rent of primary residence 7.5% 0.2% 3.8%
Medical care services & insurance 6.7% 0.6% 3.4%
Food services (food away from home) 5.6% 0.4% 3.8%
Motor vehicle insurance 2.8% 0.1% 6.1%
Education (tuition, childcare, school fees) 2.5% 0.2% 3.4%
Admission, movies, concerts, sports events, club memberships 2.0% 0.2% 4.0%
Other personal services (dry-cleaning, haircuts, legal services…) 1.6% 0.6% 4.3%
Public transportation (airline fares, etc.) 1.5% -1.8% -5.6%
Telephone & wireless services 1.5% -0.3% -0.5%
Lodging away from home, incl Hotels, motels 1.3% -2.9% -2.5%
Water, sewer, trash collection services 1.1% 0.4% 5.4%
Motor vehicle maintenance & repair 1.0% 0.2% 5.2%
Internet services 0.9% 0.5% -2.3%
Video and audio services, cable, streaming 0.8% 0.2% 3.0%
Pet services, including veterinary 0.5% 0.7% 5.6%
Tenants’ & Household insurance 0.4% 1.1% 4.8%
Car and truck rental 0.1% 3.2% 3.8%
Postage & delivery services 0.1% 0.4% 3.1%

Details on durable goods prices.

New vehicles CPI declined by 0.34% (-4.0% annualized) in June from May, the third month in a row of declines, seasonally adjusted.

Year-over-year, the index edged up by 0.2%. The price level remains below where it had been in all of 2023 and in the first part of 2024.

The spike during the free-money era, which resulted in massive historic profits for automakers and dealers, drove prices to the economic limit beyond which higher prices kill demand, and prices cannot be raised, and tariffs cannot be passed on to consumers without crushing sales, and automakers know it, and disclosed in their earnings warnings that they’re eating the tariffs, and that they’re trying to dodge them by shifting more production to the US.

GM, which makes a large portion of its US vehicles in Mexico, China, South Korea, and Canada, and moved much of its supply chains overseas, is among the hardest-hit. Tesla and Honda, whose vehicles are among those with the most US content, are among the least hit.

Used vehicle CPI fell by 0.7% in June from May (-7.8% annualized), seasonally adjusted.

Year-over-year, used vehicle prices rose by 2.8%, the sixth month in a row of year-over-year increases, and the biggest one yet. But the year-over-year comparisons are hitting the low point of the price plunge.

Major durable goods categories MoM YoY
Durable goods overall 0.1% 0.6%
New vehicles -0.3% 0.2%
Used vehicles -0.7% 2.8%
Household furnishings (furniture, appliances, floor coverings, tools) 1.0% 1.7%
Sporting goods (bicycles, equipment, etc.) 1.4% -2.5%
Information technology (computers, smartphones, etc.) 0.0% -4.7%

Food Inflation. The CPI for “Food at home” rose by 0.28% in June from May (+3.4% annualized). Beef has been the culprit for a long time and has become extremely expensive. But egg prices continued to plunge, as they unwind their avian-flu-driven price spike.

Year-over-year, the index rose by 2.4%. Since January 2020, food prices have surged by 29%.

MoM YoY
Food at home 0.3% 2.4%
Cereals, breads, bakery products -0.2% 1.1%
Beef and veal 2.0% 10.6%
Pork -0.3% 0.5%
Poultry 0.6% 3.4%
Fish and seafood 0.1% 0.9%
Eggs -7.4% 27.3%
Dairy and related products -0.3% 0.9%
Fresh fruits 1.3% 3.4%
Fresh vegetables 0.6% -1.3%
Juices and nonalcoholic drinks 1.7% 3.0%
Coffee, tea, etc. 0.7% 7.8%
Fats and oils 0.4% -1.4%
Baby food & formula 0.9% 1.8%
Alcoholic beverages at home -0.2% -0.1%

Energy.

The CPI for gasoline rose 1.01% in June from May, seasonally adjusted. In May, prices had dropped to the lowest level since September 2021.

Year-over-year, the gasoline index fell by 8.3%, on lower oil prices. Gasoline makes up about half of the overall energy CPI.

The CPI for energy overall jumped by 0.95% month-to-month. On a year-over-year basis, the index still dipped by 0.8%. Despite the ups and downs, the index has essentially been flat for two years, but at much higher levels than before the pandemic.

CPI for Energy, by Category MoM YoY
Overall Energy CPI 0.9% -0.8%
Gasoline 1.0% -8.3%
Electricity service 0.9% 7.5%
Utility natural gas to home 0.5% 14.2%
Heating oil, propane, kerosene, firewood 1.0% -2.0%

Companies have lots of room to eat the tariffs, after making gigantic profits as they jacked up consumer prices in 2020-2024 to very high levels. Now they’re finding out that consumers have had it, that they’re no longer willing to pay whatever, that price increases are a demand killer, and that tariffs are now hard to pass on because consumers reduce their purchases of those products in response.

Since Q1 2020, pretax profits of incorporated businesses of all sizes in nonfinancial industries had spiked by 122% to an annual rate of nearly $3 trillion, while Tariffs are currently collected at a rate of about $300 billion a year, which would roll back only a small portion of this huge spike in profits gained during the inflation era:

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:

To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.7K other subscribers

  133 comments for “Fed’s Nightmare: CPI Inflation in Services Reheats (not tariffed), while Inflation in Durable Goods, Apparel & Footwear (tariffed) Remains Cool

  1. Phoenix_Ikki says:

    Good, if Pow Pow is still around in Sept, he better not cut any of the short term rates. 4.2-4.3% return on Tbill is still good enough, not looking forward to TINA environment again

    • ryan says:

      The insurances are killing me personally: home; auto and health. Premiums seemingly know no bounds. Even shopping around and bundling can’t find relief. Aside from those expenses we can control ourselves and costs. Resturants, clothing, vacations…we can decide what we choose to moderate. Residential maintenace for small items are doable and for the handy andy type are fine, however major maintence (reroof) can be a killer.

      • Anthony A. says:

        I just got my annual homeowner’s policy bill last week. It’s up 34% from last year. This is getting sickening…..auto insurance cost was just as bad last go around.

        • Wolf Richter says:

          My broadband went up 60%. I could switch, but that would be even more expensive.

        • David says:

          Unpossible. Why I was informed by this very commentariat that my massive increase in California home insurance was unpossible.

        • Depth Charge says:

          The real problem is that the FED has completely broken the economy. It doesn’t matter what CPI is when you have these massive spikes and blowouts in needs areas like insurance, food, etc.

          This is why they were grotesquely premature to pause and cut – they didn’t snuff inflation out and have instead left it festering, while badly hurting people financially in the process. The entire system is deformed, with prices distorted and asset bubbles raging.

        • Brian says:

          As Wolf has pointed out many times, interest rates are still well above inflation and thus “restrictive”.

          The plan by the Fed isn’t 2% ASAP but 2% as soon as practical without risking something breaking. That seems to be working.

      • Swamp Creature says:

        Insurance companies are sending drones to examine your roof. They are requiring a home inspection to renew your policy. Then they send some junkyard dog contractor to your house to do the inspection and to find reasons to up your insurance rate, or require a roof replacement that is not necessary.

        I just got a letter from my insurance company, demanding all the above.

    • C says:

      Yields are meant to be linear. Why should short term roi be higher than the 2 year? That’s what is broken here. Servicing debt short term isn’t a long term option and 5 billion a month at 4.5% is a joke. No one should take the FED seriously at these rates, given their current plan.

      Food inflation, specifically beef, is at the lowest stocked herds since the 50s.

      Services inflation again propping up the CPI. Energy up due to political constraints (cost of regulation and taxation for ya).

      Apparel prices static. Good that we decided to close loopholes on shipments less than 800 bucks (no import tariffs) making business competitive once again.

      In short, Powell is a disaster. We will see how many other fed members are in dissent when he holds rates.

      • Phoenix_Ikki says:

        As much as I express utter contempt for Pow Pow, with this admin, I am really afraid who they will have in mind as the replacement. Gotta remember any resemblance of conventional wisdom, norm or decorum is definitely not applicable in current time. The next FED chairman will likely be extension of someone’s will regardless of how much destruction it will unleash.

        • SoCalBeachDude says:

          The Federal Reserve Chairman is just one of twelve voices on the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) which sets policy interest rates and that is one of the least important of many things that the Federal Reserve does.

        • Eric86 says:

          What fed chair is a good one to you? Because I can’t think of any

        • Eric86 says:

          Can you point to a time where conventional wisdom not and decorum produced good things for us?

          Conventional wisdom and norms got us QE and zirp, like 4 housing bubbles, a hollowed out middle class from globalization… Etc

        • Swamp Creature says:

          Judy Shelton would be a great replacement

      • Nick Kelly says:

        ‘Good that we decided to close loopholes on shipments less than 800 bucks (no import tariffs) making business competitive once again.’

        That would be a micro business to deal in less than $ 800 shipments.
        Maybe Walmart can break up their apparel orders into many 799 $ units.

        • Wolf Richter says:

          Nick Kelly,

          It was the huge Chinese retailers Temu and Shein, along with many smaller ones, and the B2B platform Alibaba, that abused the loophole to ship directly from China to US consumers. They didn’t pay the tariffs while Walmart paid the tariffs.

        • C says:

          As wolf mentioned, it crippled the Chinese manufacturing. Temu shirts for 3 bucks and they were avoiding import tariffs. Then China attempted to import goods to Mexico to build and stamp their label. That’s why Mexico has tariffs imposed on them as well. Look at their trade deficit to China and try explaining why it nearly doubled in 5-7 years. That was huge. This is a game of chess not checkers.

    • JustAsking says:

      I think we all believe inflation will soar…
      the weak dollar is a big part of it…
      and if prices are still rising with oil in the mid 60s barrel….
      WHAT IF?

      Copper, Mexican tomatoes, beef, …….the list is endless. Where will price declines appear?

      • Eric86 says:

        Copper is tariffs but the tomatoes are because Mexico violated an agreement and beef is because of that worm

  2. Doubting Thomas says:

    Wolf – Thanks for an incredibly insightful analysis, one that cuts through all the nonsense that I have read so far today in news outlets that I read regularly. I am bewildered by the inability (or unwillingness) of even the news outlets that I trust to grasp what is really going on with inflation. Again, thank you.

    • ryan says:

      Yep, Wolf is my crystal ball…he has been spot on with his analysis.

    • phillip jeffreys says:

      Agree.

      Also share common cause with Ryan. My insurance rates, specifically auto, have escalated by large percentages. Too many folks living in hurricane prone locations (or recurring fire zones) has to be one causal agent for this – their burden is shared by everyone (at least in the state I live in).

      • David says:

        My Florida home (Miami Beach) insurance has not budged this past year. My California (Bay Area, admittedly near potential fire zones) premiums have doubled.

    • Midnight Special says:

      Clap for the Wolfman!

  3. Debt-Free-Bubba says:

    Howdy Folks. Same old same old every where else. ” CPI inflation came in lower than expected”. Party on . Knew I would find the truth here.
    Thanks Lone Wolf

  4. SSK says:

    Inflation will come under control once we have 350-500 bn annual tarrif revenue reducing deficits, and we get rid of department of education 300bn USD budget (at least reduce by 100 bn
    USD)

    • SoCalBeachDude says:

      Inflation will escalate dramatically in the coming months as tariffs are factored into the prices of good sold combine with ever increasing services inflation. The Federal government will continue to endlessly run deficits of more than $1.7 trillion adding to nearly $40 trillion federal debt.

    • JimL says:

      I wish there was an easy way to make a bet with you. I would put a lot of money into that bet. Tariffs are never going to be enough to reduce the debt. Never.

      Naive.

      • Happy1 says:

        Totally agree. And it’s time for SCOTUS to return tariff making to Congress, where it Constitutionally belongs.

  5. SuperHans says:

    You all laugh but be careful…orange julius will stamp his feet twice as hard at pow pow and maybe call him a double dog bad work then you’ll all see.

  6. Tom S. says:

    I’d say there was a bit of goods inflation underneath the surface in June. Honestly hope it is just seasonal noise.

    Seasonally adjusted in June;

    Appliances: +1.9%
    Sporting goods: +1.4%
    Footwear: +0.7%
    Motor vehicle parts: +0.6%

    • Wolf Richter says:

      I can show you lots of goods prices that dropped. That always happens. Month to month in different line items, some rise, same fall, and the next month they reverse. If you only pick the ones that rose in June from May, and ignore the one that fell from in June from May, or ignore that the price increase in June only undid the price decline in May… then you’re peaching a lie.

      I gave you a chart of your item #3: footwear, so my chart was apparel and footwear, RTGDFA, it rose 0.4% in June after falling 0.4% in May and has gone nowhere and is below where it was a year ago. These fluctuations are normal.

      Here is the chart again (4th chart from the top) of your #3 that you refused to look at above… show me the tariffs in your #3 item:

      • Bear Hunter says:

        The reports are all very hokey and designed to confuse. I do not buy a major appliance every month, but I pay for food, insurance, and utilities every month.

        Tariffs will show up, they just needs a few more months to figure how to pass it along.

        You can depend on american business to be only about margin. Nothing has changed.

        • Wolf Richter says:

          consumers are now allergic to price increases when they buy goods. They buy online, and there is unlimited competition and instant price comparison. They shop around. They don’t buy. They’ve had it with getting screwed by corporate price hikes. Jacking up prices without losing sales is not easy anymore. It was easy in 2020-2022.

          What is showing up now is inflation in SERVICES, that’s the biggie, that’s 65% of what consumers spend their money on. It’s very difficult to comparison-shop healthcare services, insurance, housing costs, broadband providers (how many compete for your business?), etc. Consumers are sitting ducks for price increases in services. That’s what drives inflation.

      • Tom S. says:

        I wasn’t really preaching anything, I looked for some goods that I figure come from China, and they’ve gone up in price in June.

        I agree, if you sit around waiting for CPI to go up because of tariffs, when CPI is 65% services, and not all good are tariffed, you might wait a long time.

  7. Waiono says:

    first headline I saw this morning on yahoo started “Tariffs final show up in June inflation….”

    no shame

  8. D Diamond says:

    Thanks. That was comprehensive. The trend is your friend, We will see what happens tomorrow and the data drops ahead.

    Good job, Wolf!

  9. andrew pepper says:

    And they want the rates lowered? Housing may do a u-turn here, when inflation makes cash worth less monthly.

    • Jon says:

      I dont think so.
      The problem with housing is.. high prices along with 7 percent rates leading to extreme unaffordibility.

      If inflation remains high it means rates are not coming down it mean more un affordibility.

  10. thurd2 says:

    The 20 and 30 year bond yields are now past 5%, as I mentioned they would be a few days ago. Watch long term bond yields and read Wolf’s stuff, if you want to see reliable reflections about inflation. Ignore all the main stream media.

    • ShortTLT says:

      TLT down to $85 @ close today.

      • Ace says:

        I would not short the TLT, you have to pay the dividend. Since it began trading in 2007, it has never closed below $80. If it stays in a trading range for another ten years–which is possible–you would lose 45% in dividends by staying short. If it happens to go up for any reason, you would get hammered. Much better shorts out there. Good luck.

        • Ace says:

          I am correcting myself, The TLT began trading in 2002, not 2007.
          The lowest close was in May of 2004, it closed at $80.65.

        • ShortTLT says:

          It’s been a great trade for me so far. Puts liquidated with 50-100% gain and none have expired worthless so far.

          The dividend on TLT is also nothing to write home about. I’m aiming for about 10% annual return with my fixed income holdings.

        • Happy1 says:

          @ShortTLT,

          If you are earning 10% yield on your fixed income investments in this market, you are investing in the junkiest of junk bonds. Good luck with that…

        • David says:

          TBF is the inverse TLT and you don’t pay for it. At least directly out of pocket.

  11. 8_mile_road says:

    Now, we see that inflation mostly comes from service industry. If there is a recession coming, the demand for various services will decrease (e.g. People cut their gym membership, Netflix subscriptions etc). However, we are far from a recession

    Are there other ways to lower the inflation in service sector?

    • thurd2 says:

      Use less services. Lower demand should lead eventually to lower prices, but it may take a while. Do people right now really need a gym membership and Netflix? Buy some weights and a bench. If you have to watch tv, try tubi or pluto (they are free).

      • Bobber says:

        Some of the more costly services with questionable value:

        Low deductible insurance
        Private schools
        Cosmetic medical care
        Kids travel sports
        Investment advisors
        Trendy restaurants
        High end travel vacations
        Storage services
        Lending services

      • JohnF says:

        Just watch TV at the gym. 2 dolls this Christmas not 12.
        Try eating the dogs! Shop smart avoid Walmart.
        Whoops that’s an extra 73 mile return drive.

    • ShortTLT says:

      Change your own oil and cut your own hair (or have a friend do it).

  12. SoCalBeachDude says:

    Bond market sends troubling signal on inflation that should concern investors

    • Wolf Richter says:

      They read my inflation article LOL

      • SSK says:

        But why is bond market so worried if expense pruning (education dept) and tariff will rake in 4-5tn over 10 years?

        • SoCalBeachDude says:

          It won’t. Deficits are on track to exceed $2 trillion a year ahead.

        • Stating the Obvious says:

          Because the bond market isn’t stupid

        • JimL says:

          Because they use better sources of information than you do.

          The Education Department is a rounding error in the Federal budget. Entitlements, the military, and interest are what matter.

          Also, tariffs are not going to solve the budget crisis. Thinking $4-$5 trillion over 10 years matter means you’re either bad at basic math or you do not understand the budget.

  13. SoCalBeachDude says:

    Crypto bills fail in Congress…

    • Phoenix_Ikki says:

      and yet barely made a tiny ding in price, still at $117k….no stopping this rocket back to the moon and straight to Pluto..

      Strange time we live in when Saynor and Cathie Woodshed is looking more like the oracle than the oracle himself

  14. CJJ says:

    A nice book end is reading more about this in his Durable Goods posts or even his “Inflation & Devaluation” compendium.

  15. andy says:

    Wolf,

    Nvidia added $2 Trillion in market cap in under 3 months. Has to be a world record.

    Nvidia and Broadcom are now 10% of S&P 500.

    Their combined annual revenue is about 1.3% of S&P 500.

    Considering that S&P 500 itself is not cheap, and comparing values and revenues of hi-fliers like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Broadcom to revenues and market caps of such markets as Japan or China, we can conclude that in apples to apples comparison 1 American tech apple is worth 30-40 Asian apples.

    Just back of a napkin analysis. Probably nothing.

    P.S. – if I include after-hours quote (so far), it looks S&P 500 (SPY) did outside revesal today. Again probably nothing.

    • Phoenix_Ikki says:

      You want to see some insanity, forget Nvidia, at least they are actually bringing in money. Check out Newegg stock and the return on the past 3 months…looks like tech enthusiasm hype is still around.

    • SuperHans says:

      Stop complaining, some of us are patiently waiting for this bubble to burst to multiply our wealth like the big fish always do. Signs signs everywhere signs 🛑!

    • Ace says:

      Broadcom is not in the top ten weightings, Nvidia and Microsoft are 13.5% of the S&P. The combined valuation of just those two stocks is now $8 Trillion. The analysts and TV commentators are ignoring valuations for now. At some point, the music has to stop.

      • J J Pettigrew says:

        Do microsoft and apple have a monopoly (duopoly/biopoly) in personal computing?
        Two choices, essentially.
        Are there other examples in which the consumer only has two choices?

  16. Brian says:

    CPI is trending slightly up, which suggests rates are where they need to be or possibly too low.

    Today’s tariffs are certainly not deflationary.

  17. Shocka Locka says:

    The final paragraph in this article is really something to be appreciated.

    Regards,
    Shocka

    • AB says:

      Shocka Locka

      In the penultimate paragraph you read, “Companies have lots of room to eat the tariffs“.

      I read, “Shareholders have lots of room to eat the tariffs”.

      If they are not inflationary, bonds don’t have to create any room to eat the tariffs.

  18. Andrew Stanton says:

    Anecdotal but after a very tame increase 6 months ago, my latest auto insurance renewal quote is up almost 20% and frustratingly, is still the best price I’ve found so far.

    • ShortTLT says:

      I’d be curious to see graphs of motor vehicle CPI (from the durable goods category), overlayed with motor vehicle repair and insurance CPI components from the services category.

      If vehicles themselves are coming down in price after the initial spike, so too should insurance and repair costs… at least in theory.

      • bikerchique says:

        In theory, we are a free market based economy there should be real competition in the insurance industry. However, as the insurance companies operate under oligopoly practices, competition remains a mere theory, not practice.

  19. Jason says:

    I can see the wide grin running across your face as you’re writing the word “shocker” as you’ve been warning about services since the Fed started thinking about lowering rates. Wolf for Fed chair!

  20. Redundant says:

    Very stimulating, as usual!

    After reading your blog post, looked at a random chart somewhere that shows:

    Percentage point contribution to month-over-month core PCE inflation

    That looked like supercore PCE is really jumping and so, had to go to FRBSF to look at another cool similar chart:

    Figure 4: Contributions to 12-month “supercore” services PCE inflation

    FRBSF, has beautiful chart for just PCE, which shows a nice evolution of how goods and service inflation dynamics were tightly connected, rising like twins after pandemic in around 2021 — but then, goods inflation exploded (defying transitory miscall).

    I think, that’s a huge factor to be looking at again today, especially with tariff uncertainty, which is not baked-in yet.

    Back to Supercore chart — the “other services” components (which you indicate are now up 4.3%) — were the rocket fuel for persistent inflation (after the transitory rethink).

    As I relive that period, I was always curious about the Baumol Effect:

    “ To remain competitive for workers, services must raise wages, which then translates into higher prices, even without significant productivity improvements”

    A classic example is a barber, raising prices, but not being more productive.

    It just seems, that as service inflation bubbles higher a bit, tariff inflation is still percolating below the surface, kinda like Deepwater Horizon ….

    That said, the thing that kills service inflation is a recession — absent that, we see higher inflation.

  21. Depth Charge says:

    These clowns paused too soon, then actually cut rates which was impossibly reckless and a dereliction of their duties. The stated “2% inflation target” should be illegal. Stable prices and a 0% inflation rate should be the mandate to which they are held. Look at how they have massacred the working class and the poor.

    • JimL says:

      They made the mistake of thinking they were operating in a rational environment. The person you voted for wants rates to be drastically cut. I am sure this doesn’t resonate with you.

    • JustAsking says:

      2% is planned destruction of the currency.
      How this is allowed is the real scandal.
      Have any Congressmen recused themselves from voting on the Crypto legislation? Didnt think so.

    • Happy1 says:

      Here Here. If Congress won’t demand this, it is time to end the Fed.

  22. Depth Charge says:

    The POTUS said yesterday that the FED should cut rates to below 1%. That is beyond reckless, it’s diabolical.

    • Phoenix_Ikki says:

      Can I do a double dog dare him to find someone to carry it out? If that means it will rock the long bond market to 6% and maybe close to 10%, then by all means do it. I can then lock my money in there and not ever having to worry about TINA again…assuming there’s still value left in the dollar down the road..

      Maybe best way to fight this is to let him F around and find out or TACO bell his way out it.

    • Jackson Y says:

      The thing is, artificially loose monetary policy has historically driven asset price inflation instead of CPI (see 2008-2020), and Trump knows that & is betting it’ll be the case.

    • thurd2 says:

      If the Fed cut to 1%, long bond yields would rise to 7 or 8 percent, which would destroy the stock market. Why deal with stocks which supposedly average 8% return over time (a number I question) with risk, when you could get 7 or 8% in Treasuries guaranteed with no risk? Trump should shut up about Treasury interest rates. I am generally good with the other stuff he does, but Bessent or somebody really needs to clue him in on how interest rates work.

      • bikerchique says:

        Bessent is Trump’s lap poodle and will continue to perform inane little tricks to entertain him. He appears to be neither an original nor independent thinker. His concept of leadership is not doing what the country needs based on facts, data, but what Trump spews out based on emotions and disjointed political economic ideology.

    • JimL says:

      Didn’t you support him?

  23. Sandeep says:

    Thanks Wolf.
    Inflation in Services is deep problem and wont be going away anytime soon. Wages have gone up, Rents have gone up so Service Providers are going to pass the cost to Consumers.

    Hopefully, Trump Puppets Bowman and Wallers see this report and have some conscious. Both were very hawkish last year and now want FED to see through those inflation numbers and cut as early as July. Shame on them.
    Hope majority on FOMC will see this report as it is and dont cut anytime soon until they put inflation genie back into bottle.

  24. 4hens says:

    Durables percent change from June 2024 by Census region:

    Midwest: 2.2%
    South: 0.5%
    West: 0.7%
    Northeast: 0.4%

    Services percent change from June 2024 by Census region:

    Midwest: 4.2%
    South: 3.5%
    West: 3.4%
    Northeast: 4.4%

  25. Rico says:

    You have to admit that some services are affected by tariff. For example homeowners and auto insurance. A lot of house construction material and car parts have been tariffed which would raise insurance companies cost which is being passed on.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      Like tariffs increase raw material prices and component prices that go into airplanes, and then the airlines have to pay more for their airplanes, and then when they finally take delivery of the planes, years after ordering them, they pass on the higher costs of these planes to the fliers that buy tickets to fly on them? I may well have passed on before these tariffs hit airfares, it would take that long if ever….

      Meanwhile, airline fares actually declined month-over-month and yea-over-year.

      In terms of your scenario — tariffs increasing construction costs and thereby driving up homeowner’s insurance for existing homes that were built 30 years ago and of new homes that haven’t even been built yet – well, you’re gonna be in the same boat as me waiting for tariffs to hit airfares.

      There are a lot of other factors that will hit homeowners’ insurance, and they’re real and have been happening for years, such as as hurricanes and wildfires, and of course, oligopolistic or even monopolistic pricing practices, those are big culprits here.

      • bikerchique says:

        Few words which characterize most accurately, most vividly the present state of the US economy:
        oligopolistic or even monopolistic pricing practices

      • JimL says:

        I think you demonstrated his point without realizing it.

        Tariffs won’t show up in durable goods for a while since there are long term contracts involved and other factors as well. Any short term effect of tariffs on durable goods should be to reduce demand (which is precisely what is happening). The effects will more quickly show up in services which have a goods component related to them (like car repair and therefore insurance or home repair and therefore home insurance).

        For a while the increase in car repairs was labor related. Absolutely no doubt. However I am fairly sure the recent (last two months) the increase in car repair is more parts related. The price of car parts has soared.

        Don’t get me wrong, there are other factors dominating inflation in both home and car insurance (climate related disasters), but they are only masking the effects of price increases in car parts and home building materials.

        It is unbelievable that the current administration has only been in office for 6 months (it feels like years if not decades) and so ridiculous tariffs have been around for even less time, but so far we have mostly only seen the short term benefits of tariffs. The longer term effects are still to come (although it should be noted that even in the short term, the effects if tariffs have made Americans poorer as reflected in the buying power of the dollar). The longer term effects are just starting to show up in terms of car parts and building materials.

        I say this as someone who thinks there is some value in selectively and we’ll thought tariffs.

        • ShortTLT says:

          I haven’t noticed any significant increase in car parts prices in the last 2-3 months, even those made overseas.

          The issue I have is the quality of many parts is junk. I’d rather pay more for something known to be better quality: there’s a time cost for redoing a job due to a prematurely-failed part.

  26. Eric86 says:

    Should have never lowered rates last year. 2% is a pipe dream.

  27. Eric86 says:

    Remember when we were told inflation was transitory? Good times

    • Depth Charge says:

      Has anybody asked Weimar Boy why it’s still transitory-ing?

      • JustAsking says:

        The U S Constitution is clear
        CONGRESS controls the “Minting” (creation of money)

        How did the Fed abscond that power? Crisis after crisis….and created by whom, exactly?

        • SoCalBeachDude says:

          The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Go read it.

        • JustAsking says:

          Do you wish to point to the section dealing with the Fed creating money and managing the money supply?

          ” Federal Reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion
          of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the
          purpose of making advances to Federal Reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are hereby authorized.”

          for the purpose of making advances

    • Phoenix_Ikki says:

      Well to give Pow Pow some credit, the man never defined the timeframe on this transitory definition. Stretch out the lens of time, everything is transitory. He didn’t come out and say inflation is transitory for 6 months to a year and that gave him a way out and we’re still this transitory journey.

      As with everything, it’s all about context. One of the most notorious regime in modern history was in power for 12 years, can be consider transitory, heck even modern homo sapien only been around for 300k years and likely would not be around 300k to a million year from now, in the grand scheme of the earth history, we are also very transitory.

    • JimL says:

      To be fair, that comment was actually factually correct in terms of what was driving inflation at the time (COVID and COVID spending). It may have took a little bit longer than expected, but it was ultimately transitory. Inflation was going back to 2% until other factors intervened.

      • Happy1 says:

        The biggest “other factor” was the Fed buying mass quantities of MBS while home prices rocketed up 30%. Talk about an own goal. The shortage of goods relating to the pandemic was transitory. The increase in money supply still hasn’t been corrected with QT 5 years later.

    • Happy1 says:

      So far it’s been 4 years of 3%+ inflation

  28. Eric86 says:

    Hopefully this is just a blip and the trend starts going down again. It did this in 2023 and 2024 as well. Unfortunately short of a massive recession prices won’t drop quickly

  29. jjpettigrew says:

    Where is the 2% trajectory line on the CPI chart from 2021?

    Well below where we are now.

    And ask, why is YOY the metric? How about a 4 year window?

  30. Crystal says:

    This is why the bulk of services inflation is in services with housing as Wolf explained. You have to have a running furnace/AC, if you have a mortgage, you have to have insurance. We had to replace the furnace in November, the AC in May and eat an insurance increase as well as property tax increase. Midwest- Ohio and I’m a property and casualty agent so even with my discounts the increase hit us too. You can increase your deductible up to your risk threshold, pay in full and cross your fingers – only relief available.

    • Eric86 says:

      Man refrigerant, r22, is like 40-50% higher than 3 years ago. I had to get my AC recharged.

      Couple that with minimum wage increases and local utilities raising rates by 4-6% it isn’t surprising to me that stuff is going up

      • thurd2 says:

        Eric86, I had to recharge my car AC and had never done it. So I called the local car repair shop and they wanted $150 just to check out my AC system, before doing a recharge. I went to Autozone, bought a recharge kit for $50, read the instructions, and did it myself (it was not difficult, just a little weird). My contribution to Whip Inflation Now.

        • Eric86 says:

          Oh I was speaking of home a/c. Like 400 per pound. R22 is being phased out so it is super expensive and the new refrigerant doesn’t work on older systems.

          I often wonder what effect things like that have on CPI.

  31. Jackson Y says:

    TTM Core PCE has been stuck around the 2.7% level since May 2024. How much longer will it take for them to publicly admit that (a) current rates aren’t restrictive enough or (b) they’ve unofficially given up on the 2% target. It’s not really a credible target if they’re allowed to overshoot it for 4.5 years straight…?

    (There is tremendous pressure from Wall St & DC to lower rates to juice markets, not out of economic necessity. But the FOMC’s current views regarding sub-3% neutral rates etc. started from before the election.)

  32. Jackson Y says:

    Tariffs aren’t a major driver of inflation. For all the chaotic back & forth policy coming from this administration, the current economy is largely the same as it was last autumn: ~4.1% unemployment, ~2.7% core PCE.

    Consumers & businesses have gotten accustomed to 4.5 years of elevated inflation. The fastest way to get rid of it is with a recession that lowers demand.

    • JimL says:

      You missed a very important component. The value of the dollar. American’s are much poorer as the value if the dollar has dropped.

  33. John O says:

    These analyses and great, thank you. I think it would be great if you could also include the values/graphs for other inflation metrics like median CPI, Cleveland fed trimmed mean CPI or Dallas fed trimmed mean PCE (when available), as these graphs clearly show that median inflation rates are still well above target (and for some haven’t moved much at all in the last two years). Or have a separate post or discussion about them. In any event, thanks again.

  34. Michael Bond says:

    BLS quality adjustment index

    I would love for someone to build a BLS quality adjustment index so we can all see how much our standard of living goes up each year.

    We know goods CPI was running -2% before COVID. So how much was the adjustment.

    I have to go with Core Services as the better measure even with all its issues.

  35. Citizen AllenM says:

    Dang dirty 30 pushed through 5 today. That services number can be fixed, but good by real estate going through the disaster.

    Meanwhile, we just wait for more of the above. It’s going to be long and hard until this mess is done.

    The crisis of 2036 will now be from now until it’s all solved and stable, or blows out and we get a new new deal.

    Fun and games.

  36. northernlights says:

    I wonder if insurance is going to be what blows up housing based on stupid valuations plus legitimate risks like floods, fires, Cthulu, whatever. There is so much money floating around that I think a lot of small time speculators are paying property taxes and trying to ride out the downturn. If insurance drives folks to sell at lower prices it will eventually drop insurance rates along with valuations.

    Where I live (Wake County NC) a SAS algorithm essentially sets assessed values, and the algorithm has a vivid imagination. The current valuations are based on the massively inflated values of fall 2023.

    • Eric86 says:

      Abolish property taxes and just have a sales tax for local jurisdictions. There is zero reason why we should be taxed on unrealized gains aka increases in property value.

      • Clykke says:

        Errr because they take up more land and therefore on average use more services? Because it incentivizes people to downsize rather than always chasing higher asset values? Because it’s less regressive to the non and small property owners? Because excessive sales taxes hurt businesses and damage local economies? There are plenty of reasons.

        Also try funding a state like Illinois or New York with just sales taxes, it’s not going to happen. Higher income taxes would be the only other option.

      • dougzero says:

        The wealthy have an obligation. Property taxes in NC fund education for everyone. Each property requires services such as fire police etc. Sales tax are regressive. Property taxes make sense to me. One can challenge one’s evaluation..

        • Happy1 says:

          Income taxes are much more equitable. Retirees in high cost areas bear a disproportionate burden with property taxes. Ideally there would be no property taxes IMO

  37. Redundant says:

    Just a little perspective here:

    Cumulative CPI increase (2009-2025): The Consumer Price Index has seen a cumulative price increase of approximately 49.84% since 2009.
    Interpretation: This means that what cost $1 in 2009 would cost roughly $1.50 in 2025, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index.

    The cumulative impacts of deficits are destroying the future

Leave a Reply to Redundant Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *