US Government Sold $602 Billion of Treasuries this Week, 10-Year Treasury Yield Bounces Back to 4.20%, 30-Year Yield to 4.86%, Highest since Sep 4, after Fed Cuts

All of it to fund the ballooning debt that hit $38.4 Trillion. 

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

This week, even during the relatively quiet pre-holiday period, the government sold $602 billion in Treasury securities spread over 9 auctions on four days (there are no Treasury auctions on Fridays), including 10-year Treasury notes and 30-year Treasury bonds.

Of these auction sales, $483 billion were Treasury bills with maturities from 4 weeks to 26 weeks.

The auction yields are in the right column. The rate cuts have pushed down the yields of T-bills, and of the 3-year Treasury notes, but have done nothing for the yields of the 10-year Treasury notes and the 30-year Treasury bonds:

Type Auction date Billion $ Auction yield
Bills 6-week Dec-09 78.2 3.650%
Bills 13-week Dec-08 89.7 3.650%
Bills 17-week Dec-10 69.2 3.610%
Bills 26-week Dec-08 80.3 3.580%
Bills 4-week Dec-11 85.3 3.610%
Bills 8-week Dec-11 80.3 3.614%
Bills 483.0

And $119 billion of the auction sales this week were notes and bonds.

Notes & Bonds Auction date Billion $ Auction yield
Notes 3-year Dec-08 58.0 3.614%
Notes 10-year Dec-09 39.0 4.175%
Bonds 30-year Dec-11 22.0 4.773%
Notes & bonds 119.0
Total auction sales 602.0

The $39 billion of 10-year Treasury notes were sold at the auction on Tuesday at a yield of 4.175%.

They replaced the $21 billion of 10-year notes that were issued on December 15, 2015 at a yield of 2.23% and that matured in November. So nearly double the debt, at nearly double the interest rate. US government finances are not for the faint of heart.

By early Wednesday, in the secondary market, the 10-year Treasury yield had gone over 4.21%. Then came the FOMC meeting, the rate cut, the T-bill purchases, and Powell, and the yield dropped 10 basis points but bottomed out at 4.10% by early Thursday. Then it bounced off and rose, and at the moment, Friday morning, was back to 4.20% (hourly chart via Investing.com).

So around the 25-basis-point rate cut announcement by the Fed, the 10-year Treasury yield fell in the secondary market but then rose again on Thursday, and by Friday morning, the 10-year Treasury yield was 54 basis points higher than the Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR, blue in the chart), which the Fed targets with its policy rates.

The daily chart below doesn’t show all the hourly drama of the 10-year yield around the FOMC meeting.

In normal credit markets, long-term yields, such as the 10-year Treasury yield, are quite a bit higher than short-term yields, such as the EFFR, and are not driven by the Fed’s short-term rates.

The $22 billion of 30-year Treasury bonds were sold at a yield of 4.773% at the auction on Thursday.

By Thursday evening, in the secondary market, the 30-year Treasury yield was back at 4.80%, and by this morning it rose to 4.86%, the highest since September 4. It’s almost funny how the 30-year yield blows off the Fed’s rate cuts. It’s all about inflation fears and supply fears:

T-bills outstanding hit a record $6.7 trillion at the end of November, up by 18.6% from a year ago.

The Treasury Department is beginning to shift more issuance to T-bills, and the Fed is starting to buy them in the secondary market to replace the MBS that are coming off its balance sheet, and as part of its Reserve Management Purchases.

But the total amount of “Treasury securities held by the public” – not including those held by government entities, such as government pension funds and the Social Security Trust Fund – also ballooned to a new record of $30.8 trillion at the end of November, on substantial new issuance, and month-to-month, the share of T-bills actually dipped a hair to a share of 21.8% of all Treasuries held by the public.

During past crisis events, the government issued huge amounts of T-bills quickly which caused T-bills’ share of the total debt held by the public to spike for short periods, such as to a 34.4% share in November 2008 during the Financial Crisis, or to a 25.5% share in June 2020. During panic times, there’s lots of demand for T-bills. Then over time, the government replaced maturing T-bills with notes and bonds, helped by the Fed’s massive QE operations at the time, and the share of T-bills declined again.

The Treasury debt that drives all this and that has to be funded and refunded through these auctions hit $38.35 trillion as of December 10, up by $2.2 trillion from a year ago.

This is the total debt, in all its glory, consisting of $30.79 trillion of Treasury securities held by the public and $7.56 trillion of Treasury securities held internally.

The portion of the issuance that replaces maturing debt does not add to the debt. But the additional issuance to fund the new deficits adds to the amount of the debt.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:

WOLF STREET FEATURE: Daily Market Insights by Chris Vermeulen, Chief Investment Officer, TheTechnicalTraders.com.

To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.8K other subscribers

  24 comments for “US Government Sold $602 Billion of Treasuries this Week, 10-Year Treasury Yield Bounces Back to 4.20%, 30-Year Yield to 4.86%, Highest since Sep 4, after Fed Cuts

  1. Kracow says:

    Let’s go 10y to 6%+ and 30y even higher.

    • Evan says:

      Would you even buy then though? That’s true death cycle territory and the US would be unable (they ain’t hiking taxes or cutting benefits in near the magnitude needed) to service the new debt without a funcational default: fiscal dominance.

      It’s a spending vs revenue problem that needs to be fixed ASAP. The American people need to wake up.

  2. Brendan says:

    The portion of the issuance that replaces maturing debt does not add to the total debt, but might they need to replace an increasing portion of the shorter term maturing debt with long term debt, leading to higher interest expense, which would?

  3. Klaus Kastner says:

    My question is: does the $38.35TR include debt of states/cities, etc.? It seems to me that when European countries report their debt to Eurostat, the total national debt includes federal, regional and local public entities. How is that in the US?

    • TSonder305 says:

      It does not. The states and local governments have another $5-6 trillion, collectively, if I remember correctly.

      Theoretically, I would think additional state and local debt could cause the federal debt to increase as well, as if the states and local governments issue tax-free municipal bonds, investors in those wouldn’t pay federal taxes on the interest income. But I suspect the relationship is fairly tenuous.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      “Treasury debt” = “National debt” = “Treasury securities outstanding” = Treasury debt”

      State and local government debt in the US is about $6 trillion all combined.

      • Klaus Kastner says:

        So if EU countries report a debt/GDP ratio to Eurostat where the debt includes regional and local debt, that ratio is not comparable to the ratio which the US reports (because it does not include regional/local debt). The deficit/GDP ratio within the EU (Maastricht = 3%) consolidates the federal budgets with the regional/local budgets. Also not comparable with the US.

    • Freedomnowandhow says:

      Klaus Kastner, no the Federal supposed “debt” is basically a savings account for private enterprise, and the interest paid upon renewal is in the sovereign dollar, produced by the full trust in the U.S. Federal Government. Europe’s currency, again interest payment is the Euro, which is not the sovereign currency of any of the Countries, but of the European Union. Hope that helps.

      • Freedomnowandhow says:

        …. Legal action of the currency in the U.S. is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress, and the Federal Reserve Bank. Each in It’s own can be dictated by the popular vote of only citizens of the U.S.. in essence. Individual Countries in the European Union do not have that, they can be the minority vote on the value/use of the Euro. I personally think England’s goal toeave the E.U. is a good thing for them. The E.U. monetary system hasn’t helped Greece in substance for their citizens.

  4. JustAsking says:

    The Fed continues to attempt water to run uphill.
    More supply, in a free market, would depress prices.
    The conclusions are obvious.

    4.2 should be the pivotal point for trading ten yrs….and likely the Fed will find a way to protect those who took down the auctions…for a while.

    Tremendous article in mises.org regarding the societal and generational impact of pumping assets. In an inflationary environment labor trades at a discount compared to assets and durable goods. Services are beginning to catch up, but can they continue?

  5. Glen says:

    Looks like I will be exiting the treasury market. It used to be a better deal considering no need to pay the 9.3% CA state tax but now my savings account even with that pays more. Might as well have that money fully liquid if not making additional money on locking it up. Hopefully long term goes up but my sense is just way too much money and people will purchase even if not much more than inflation and nice to have sideline money to put back in market whenever downturn eventually shows up. Definitely a challenge right now as I start getting ready for retirement in a few years.

    • Evan says:

      I mean…do you really think your savings account interest rate isn’t going down as a result of this???

      • 4hens says:

        When the fed was raising rates, I would get a crowing email from my bank that they raised my account rate (weeks if not months after the fed raise!).

        Now that rates are falling, my bank lowers my account rate within a week or two, and sends no email.

        It’s pretty funny!

        • The Struggler says:

          The high yield savings account I use emailed me about the rate lowering by 5bps.

          By the time I got on to look, the account rate was 5bps lower than that….

          It’s still 140bps higher than my regular savings account though.

  6. Bruce says:

    Where is the money (Cash) that financed $38.35T national debt?

  7. crazytown says:

    Wow, we’re up $2T since the debt ceiling, great work to all our leaders in DC! Phenomenal growth, very inspiring to us all.

  8. thurd2 says:

    Trump keeps pushing the Fed for lower rates. He must realize by now that lowering Fed Funds rates in the face of decent jobs numbers and 3% or higher inflation tends to increase long term rates because of inflation fears. Maybe Trump wants higher mortgage rates. Or he is just plain stupid. Note, I agree with most of Trump’s policies, but he is nuts when it comes to the Fed Funds rate, unless he wants higher long term rates. A further note, I see food prices are skyrocketing again.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      But prices of avocados and eggs have collapsed since spring, LOL

      • Anthony A. says:

        Eggs and avocados provide needed protein and good fats so we don’t need to buy expensive beef! LOL!

    • 4hens says:

      “Maybe Trump wants higher mortgage rates.”

      Maybe the goal is to cap or reduce prices by preventing rates from falling. Or maybe the issue is low on his priority list. Or maybe he wants lower overall financing costs and is okay trading higher mortgage rates for that.

  9. Delusional about inflation says:

    “T bills outstanding hit a record $6.7 trillion at the end of November, up by 18.6% from a year ago.”~ this(T bills outstanding) is important to keep and eye on. I am guessing we will see over 30% growth YOY. I will look here at wolf street for the data drop next year! T bills outstanding is giant trap when the fed funds rate goes up to fight inflation. I was told hedge funds are depositing money(via contracts) in money market funds as collateral for leverage, so buyers for T bills are plentiful and is the reason total money market assets keep going up. I keep saying unemployment rate will be inverted with the inflation rate in 27, I have been fixated on this outcome of inversion( maybe delusional) Ha

  10. Bob B says:

    The Fed is always looking in the past- using suspect (IMHO) or missing data to try to set the future path of the economy. Any effects from changes in the Fed rates can take months to impact the actual real economy – even if the stock market speculators can react in an instant. Recessions seem to occur after the Fed has lowered interest rates, showing they are late to the game. And long term treasury rates and mortgage rates are more controlled by the market.

    I think the Fed needs to flip its model and set what they think the proper neutral rate is to balance inflation and employment and then don’t change it for 6 months or a year. Set the rate and tell the market “this is what you get, now adjust accordingly “. Let the market and businesses adjust. It might be a shock and rough at first but eventually I think the markets would do a much better job of pricing rates.

    And quit having FOMC meetings every six weeks. And stop all the public speaking by FOMC members. They provide no real benefit, they just help the spectators try to bet on how to make more money. The dot plots are just a silly game. How often do people go back and look at last year’s dot plots to see if they are right or wrong?

    The Fed policy should be as neutral and stable as possible. Twice annual meetings would be enough. And they should layoff half their PhDs at Eccles.

    Call me crazy or stupid, but the current system doesn’t work well for the entire country, only the bankers.

  11. Rcohn says:

    The yield curve is now upward sloping or “normal”. In the past , even more upward sloping curves were common .
    As the Feds portfolio of MBS runs off , one silent subsidy for mortgage rates will be eliminated .
    It seems that factors are coming together to raise mortgage rates, not lower them
    Together with ever rising property insurance , property taxes and maintenance costs , higher mortgage rates will guarantee a bear market in housing

Leave a Reply to Freedomnowandhow Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *