What Trump’s Tariffs Did Last Time (2018-2019): No Impact on Inflation, Doubled Receipts from Customs Duties, and Hit Stocks

I watched this stuff last time, amazed by the lack of inflation. Sure, “This time it’s different,” but those are the four most costly words on Wall Street.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

President Trump has now started implementing his promise to impose new or additional tariffs on goods from various countries, starting with China, Canada, and Mexico. Trump already imposed tariffs in 2018 against various countries. Now, once again, the media are all over how prices are going to jump for consumers because tariffs are a “regressive consumption tax,” and how tax receipts from tariffs won’t go up, etc. etc.

Now we’ll look at what tariffs did and didn’t do last time. One, they didn’t trigger inflation, which stayed below the Fed’s target. Two, they more than doubled tax receipts from customs duties. And three, they hit stocks, and the S&P 500 tanked 20% in 2018.

Sure, “This time it’s different” – but those are the four most expensive words on Wall Street.

Inflation did not accelerate.

We reported on the tariffs back then, also expecting price increases, thinking that companies would be passing on their increased costs. But that didn’t happen. They tried, but couldn’t. And the Fed-favored “core” PCE price index (blue) remained below the Fed’s 2% target and then decelerated further.

The reason that inflation remained cool and cooled off further in 2018-2019 was that durable goods inflation was essentially zero.

Tariffs are not applied to imported services; they’re applied only to imported goods. And those tariffs should have shown up in durable goods inflation because a lot of durable goods are imported, or their components are imported, and were tariffed.

The PCE price index for durable goods remained negative throughout that time…

…while the CPI for durable goods – CPI usually tracks a little higher than the PCE Price index – moved in a range of -2% to +1% year-over-year. The chart below shows the price level, not the year-over-year change, and it’s a little clearer about there essentially not being any inflation in durable goods at that time:

This lack of inflation in durable goods despite the tariffs throughout the period until the pandemic price spike surprised many of us observers. But there are reasons for it.

It’s hard for companies to raise prices and not lose sales. There is lots of competition in the US, including from domestic production. Companies, including retailers, raised their prices, but then lost sales and couldn’t sell at those prices, and their inventories piled up because Americans hate, hate, hate higher prices, and then these companies had to roll back their price increases in order to salvage their revenues. And in doing so, the companies and their suppliers ate those tariffs lock, stock, and barrel.

Customs duties more than doubled in less than two years.

Tax receipts from tariffs soared to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $80 billion in Q3 2019, from under $40 billion before 2018. The pandemic with its shortages and import hang-ups then mucked things up, but by Q1 2021, when Biden took over, customs duties were back at $80 billion and continued to rise through Q2, 2022, reaching nearly $110 billion.

This chart shows two things: One, the surge of customs duties under Trump. And two, it’s not something Trump invented. Customs duties had been collected before, and Trump just added to them, and they continued to be collected under Biden. Now the new tariffs will add to those customs duties already being collected.

We don’t know how much in customs duties the new tariffs will add to the existing customs duties, and the current amounts are not huge by government-deficit standards, but with the huge US government deficit, every $100 billion counts.

The stock market tanked in 2018. Tariffs are good for the US economy because they change the math for domestic production, and the primary, secondary, and tertiary effects of producing in the US are great for employment, tax receipts, household incomes, etc. But tariffs are not good for the S&P 500. Stocks got hit last time.

The reason why tariffs can hit stocks is because tariffs are a direct tax on Corporate America’s gross profit margins on imported goods.

But even for the S&P 500, new tariffs are just a one-time hit. So if the new tariffs cause a company’s gross profit margins to decline from 20% to 19% in 2025-2026, that’s it; they would not decline every year, but just once after tariffs are implemented, and then remain stable.

It’s not the end of the world for stocks. Crazy overvaluation is a far bigger problem for stocks. In 2018, QT-1 was also beginning to bite, and the Fed was nudging up its policy rates at snail’s pace. A mix of things came together in 2018, and the S&P 500 tanked 20%. But it didn’t last long.

Some basics about tariffs.

I posted this list before. But it’s important, so here it is again:

  1. Tariffs have two roles: raising taxes (which the US desperately needs); and changing the economic math for domestic production.
  2. US “trading partners” have used tariffs extensively to raise taxes and to protect and support their own industries at the expense of US production and exports. The US has used tariffs, they all have used tariffs to raise taxes essentially since the beginning.
  3. Tariffs are applied to the cost for the importer. If a big US retailer buys T-shirts by container loads from a factory in Bangladesh that it intends to retail in the US for $9.99 each, and if the tariff on this product is 25%, the importer (the retailer) is going to have to pay 25% in taxes on the cost from the factory. If the factory charges $1 per T-shirt, the tariff amounts to 25 cents.
  4. Tariffs are a direct tax on the profit margins of foreign producers and US importers. Whether or not they can charge more for their products without gutting their sales to pass on the tariffs is decided by the market. And if they can pass on a portion or all of the tariffs, it would be a one-time bump.
  5. Companies are already charging the maximum amount they can and still obtain their sales goals. If they raise prices to pass on the tariffs, sales may fall. Whether or not the retailer can raise the price of the T-shirt to $10.24 without pulling the rug out from under the desired sales volume is decided by the market, not by the retailer, and the retailer may find that it has to eat the tariffs.
  6. US importers may negotiate the purchase price to where the foreign factory eats part of the tariff, in which case foreign producers pay the taxes to the US government.
  7. Domestic production reduces transportation expenses, loss of Intellectual Property (a huge issue in China), supply-chain uncertainty and lead times (catastrophic issues during the pandemic), and other costs and risks. Tariffs tilt the balance further in favor of domestic production.
  8. Foreign manufacturers can avoid tariffs by producing in the US. All major foreign automakers that sell in the US already manufacture vehicles in the US. In terms of “US content,” Honda models are right behind Tesla on top of that list. Tariffs will further encourage US production, including of components and assemblies.
  9. Many producers have cut prices in the US over the past two years, either directly or through incentives to reach their sales goals, including automakers (here) and homebuilders (here). In this environment, they will eat 100% of any tariffs because they cannot pass on any additional costs.
  10. Industrial robots cost about the same anywhere. Products can be and are manufactured in the US price-competitively when advanced automation reduces the labor-cost component. Tariffs add some pluses to that math.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.



  7 comments for “What Trump’s Tariffs Did Last Time (2018-2019): No Impact on Inflation, Doubled Receipts from Customs Duties, and Hit Stocks

  1. BillMc says:

    But aren’t these tariffs much larger and wide ranging this time? And aren’t we going see the same in kind from Mexico and Canada? And won’t this cause unemployment to go up on both sides of the border, at least in the short term, as demand falls and companies try to sure up margins?

    • Wolf Richter says:

      1. The US had the biggest trade deficits in 2023 with China, then Europe, then Mexico — TRADE DEFICITS. In 2018, the trade deficit with China was even bigger. Imports from China got slammed by tariffs, so some of the trade was then routed through Vietnam by 2023 as you can see in the chart below.

      2. “Trading partner” is a commonly used BS term that adds imports and exports together, but what matters are imports, and the trade deficit with each country (exports MINUS imports).

      3. The principles are the same?

      — No/little impact on inflation because Americans hate, hate, hate price increases, and they’re stick and tired of them, and companies that try to raise their prices will watch their sales plunge.

      — Receipts from customers duties will soar, thank you!

      — Stocks will tank? (Don’t look now)

      https://wolfstreet.com/2024/02/08/us-trade-deficit-in-2023-dropped-19-as-goods-deficit-with-china-plunged-29-imports-exports-of-goods-services/

  2. toby says:

    Thank you, I understand tariffs much better since I read your blog.

    The big problem is that people who are attacking tariffs AND who defend tariffs in the media/ social networks etc. are missing that point. If Trump would communicate half as coherent as you do I suspect people would have much less proplems with it.

    And the trade balance didn’t get better 2018-2019 and it won’t be getting better this time around. It can’t as long as the deficit is as it is.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      The trade balance didn’t improve because Corporate America tried by hook or crook to subvert the tariffs, and they lobbied mightily to get exemptions, and were given exemptions, they routed trade through Vietnam to get around the China tariffs, etc. etc. Corporate America hates tariffs, billionaires hate tariffs, the billionaire-owned media hate tariffs, such as Murdoch’s WSJ, Barron’s, MarketWatch, Fox, etc., Bezo’s WaPo, Buffett’s newspaper empire (20?), Sulzberger family’s NY Times, etc. They all fought and will fight Trump tooth and nail on tariffs. Some of those billionaires are in Trump’s inner circle now, so we can be assured that the new crop of tariffs will also be subverted.

  3. Digger Dave says:

    I don’t get the 10% on China, since that’s all the cheaply made garbage that can’t cost much to produce. Seems backwards. And China didn’t seem to even care that much. Canada, unless you count the things that they subsidize (health care), doesn’t have an unfair advantage on labor. Only thing that makes sense is that it generates attention and deal making – Getting to play host to all kinds of groveling sleezebag business owners who want exemptions. And now, since sitting presidents can’t be prosecuted, and because Congress is feckless, there are no restrictions on being openly transactional for personal gain. Maybe that’s all there is to it.

    • Nativediver says:

      I suspect this leaves him room to negotiate and show force. If they retaliate, he can add 10 or 20% more for example. Of course, that is conjecture, but makes sense to me.

  4. Jonno says:

    I wonder if the reason corporate America absorbed the tariffs in 2018 and 2019 was because their margins had been inflated by near-zero interest rates on their borrowings. ZIRP gave them some fat to play with. With interest rates normalizing as fixed-rate debt starts to mature, that fat may not be available this time. Corporations could get hit with a double-whammy on their profit margins: increasing finance costs and increasing import duty at the same time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *