Venture Capital Slammed by Fed Tightening: Exits Blocked after IPOs & SPACs Collapsed, Distributions at Financial Crisis Lows

Rise of Zombie VCs that stick around collecting fees as their startups run out of cash and die. The AI boom is the exception.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

Outside of the boom in anything with AI or Machine Learning (ML) in its name or description, a lot of hot air has come out of the Venture Capital industry from the steamy levels during the free-money era of the pandemic.

Since the Fed started hiking rates and switched from QE to QT, marking the end of free money, VC funds experienced large-scale write-downs of their portfolio companies. They now cannot exit those startups by selling them because the market has tightened, after many hundreds of companies that VCs sold to the public during the free-money era via IPO or SPAC merger collapsed and entered into our pantheon of Imploded Stocks.

Exits in dollar terms amounted to only $10 billion in Q3, according to the Venture Capital Monitor for Q3 from PitchBook. VC funds sold only 14 portfolio companies via public listings. For the year through Q3, VCs booked only $69 billion in exits, down by 91% from the full-year 2021 of $780 billion in exits, which was the steamy and final year of free money. In 2024 so far, compared to 2021:

  • Exits via IPOs or SPACs: -95% (red)
  • Exits via buyouts by PE firms: -91% (yellow)
  • Exits via acquisition by Corporations: -64.5% (purple)

Successful exits are what makes the VC industry work. VC funds have to be able to sell their portfolio companies, at least some of them, at a huge profit, and then distribute the proceeds from the sale to the limited partners (LPs) in their funds so that these investors can re-invest their VC allocations in new VC funds that invest in the next cycle of startups.

The exit is when everyone makes money – except, as we learned over the past three years when these newly public IPO and SPAC stocks collapsed, the buyers; they ended up holding the bag. But now the whole system of exits, fundraising, and dealmaking has gotten clogged up because the pipeline of exits is blocked.

“The market continues to be flush with headwinds despite the 50-basis-point rate cut from the Federal Reserve (the Fed) in September, which will continue to pressure the exit market for the near term,” PitchBook said in the report.

Exits via merger with a SPAC, which have proven to be particularly destructive to buyers of those shares, have collapsed by 96% in dollar terms from the peak of the whole year in 2021 to just $4.7 billion so far this year.

Blocked exit pipeline causes indigestion. Because VC funds cannot sell, or don’t want to at currently possible valuations, their portfolio companies have been staying private for longer as they wait for the miracles to be performed by some rate cuts from the Fed.

These still private companies have to raise funds in new rounds of funding, often down-rounds at lower valuations. And those that are not so lucky and cannot raise funds are left to fend for themselves by cutting expenses until they run out of money and shut down.

The backlog of companies in the blocked exit pipeline has ballooned the US private company inventory by about 26% over the past three years, to a record high of 57,674 startups, according to PitchBook.

“This upward trend of private company inventory means investors are struggling to translate numbers on their balance sheets into realized returns to reinvest into VC, so startups are having a harder time securing additional rounds of funding,” PitchBook said.



And cash distributions to their Limited Partners have plunged. PitchBook:

“As a share of net asset value (NAV), our most recent data shows that cash back to LPs is flowing at a rate nearly as low as during the global financial crisis (GFC) and has been in the single digits for eight consecutive quarters.

“The average quarterly rate of distributions over the past decade has been 16.8%, demonstrating just how dire the distribution scene has been.

“This lagged data point is as of March 31, 2024, and knowing that Q2 and Q3 were also incredibly slow in terms of exits, we expect this rate to remain as low as data is added.”

The rise of the zombie VCs. The number of active venture investors – those that made a deal in 2024 so far – has collapsed by 55% from 2022, to just 11,425 unique investors, according to PitchBook.

The other 45%, around 14,000 venture investors, have not made an investment so far in 2024. They represent the ballooning ranks of the zombie funds. PitchBook said in a note:

“So-called zombie funds can’t raise money from LPs or write checks to new startups. Unlike the companies they back, which go bankrupt when they run out of money, GPs tend to disappear quietly. By overseeing their existing portfolio and collecting management fees, these firms can operate for years as zombies.

“When the venture market took a turn over two years ago, industry watchers began to warn of an impending rise in these funds.

“One prominent voice, then-CEO of Techstars Maelle Gavet, predicted in a 2023 CNBC interview that: “[it] could be as high as up to 50% of VCs in the next few years that are just not going to be able to raise their next fund.”

Clamoring for lower rates to unclog the pipeline. Free money is the best money obviously, including for the VC industry whose free-money boom was spectacular, allowing them to exit a huge number of portfolio companies at huge valuations via IPOs and SPAC mergers that then collapsed within the portfolios of retail investors. But this may have been as good as it was going to get.

Now the Fed has cut by 50 basis points and everyone is clamoring for more cuts to make sure that T-bill yields of 5% are wiped off the face of the earth, so that this competition for VC funds vanishes, thereby making VC funds more appealing to LPs as an alternative.

But those rate cuts may be a mixed blessing. Since the Fed has started its rate-cut cycle, longer-term Treasury yields have shot higher, with the 10-year yield up by 45 basis points to 4.10% as of Friday, as the yield curve begins to un-invert and inflation fears resurface in the bond market.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.



  12 comments for “Venture Capital Slammed by Fed Tightening: Exits Blocked after IPOs & SPACs Collapsed, Distributions at Financial Crisis Lows

  1. phleep says:

    Perhaps a company rename can help, as in, from anything “dot com” to anything “blockchain” to anything “AI.” But I guess the public company stockholders are the ones to fall for that.

  2. Phoenix_Ikki says:

    Venture capitalists? Couldn’t have happened to a bunch of nicer people…too bad most of them will still be filthy rich despite all these mishaps..

  3. THEWILLMAN says:

    During 2021 SPAC boom you got 20-50x multiples on revenue, basically zero due diligence and didn’t need to be profitable.

    If you needed to “wait a few years” in 2021 your company either no longer exists or will no longer exist soon.

    All that’s left in terms of legitimate companies are seed and series A/B who were too small in 2021 and will take several more years (at least) until they’re ready for going public. They’ll have down rounds but be fine in the end as revenue grows over a handful of years.

    Until then I think things will be very quiet.

  4. Anon says:

    It would be interesting to see a list of companies launched by VC over the last 10 to 20 years and how those companies are viewed today. I would guess we would hear wonder stories if the outcomes were solidly positive. The only VC stories I have read before today were used to attack Mitt Romney.

  5. Tim McLean says:

    I understand this article puts VC in a bad light, but I made an investment into a VC fund about two years ago. It’s a very small fund($100 million). The fund has looked at 300 ideas and invested in 12 or 14 portfolio cos. I’m amazed at the great ideas. We are ready to cash in on our 1st investment at a 40x ROE. It’s not for everyone, but I like my chances in VC vs. the S&P at these levels.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      “I understand this article puts VC in a bad light,”

      Maybe you didn’t read the article? This article discussed:

      – how exits are becoming very difficult to pull off now. You said: “We are ready to cash in on our 1st investment at a 40x ROE.” OK great, but who’s buying? Have you found anyone yet? Corporate? PE? Public? Done deal or just hope? Why did it take so long for the first exit?

      – how VC exits via IPO and SPAC through 2022 blew up retail investors, NOT LPs. You’re an LP, not the retail investor. You’re the seller not the buyer here.

      – how distributions to LPs (you) have slowed to a crawl. According to your statement, you have gotten zero distributions from the fund so far (no exits). So you haven’t made any money yet. You’re still waiting to make money. How long has your money been tied up in the fund? That’s the kind of stuff the article discussed.

      — you as LP need two huge exits to come out ahead even if the other 12 portfolio companies fizzle or die.

      • Tim McLean says:

        Thanks for your feedback Wolf. To your comments:
        1) Yes the money is in the bank. Buyers were the largest CPA firms in the world.
        2) Agreed, yes I am an LP. I have been in banking for 36 years, I understand the difference. When my brother and I invested, we expected a 7 to 10 year tie up. Not a big deal for less than 5% of my portfolio.
        3) You asked how long our funds have been tied up. As I noted in my comments, our funds have been tied up for 2 years.
        4) Agreed that we need a few huge exits. One is in the bank. Our VC mgt team is great. So, I sleep well.

  6. Biker says:

    Perhaps similarity to with Private Equity problems in general?

    That is again a bad smell for small caps. Less likely that their most explosive growth period be as a public company. Exit problem.

    Before there was too many PE grabbing small companies rather than allow them go IPO earlier. Private Equity was a king back then. Again less likely that their most explosive growth period be as a public company. Entry related.

  7. Phoenix_Ikki says:

    I think if Oxford ever needs a picture for reference next to the word Venture capitalist and kind of SPACs or king of dumping onto bagholders, they need a picture of Chamath Palihapitiya right next to it. Talk about talking his lemming followers to the cleaner..

  8. someGuy says:

    Another ripple down of this is how should I say this; job creation destruction. Mr Greenspan can feel free to take me to lunch for that one.

    To me VC is a mixed bag. They allow experimentation, however rarely does a great company seem to be built via this route. And def some very, very, lousy ones have. Very. There’s a certain reflexiveness to technology; which allows VC’s to optimize value quickly, but the actual value of what is built is often fleeting and very opaque. A country in Asia, north Asia said not to worry too much about America trying to build things, because we were too busy looking at our insta feeds. That type of value is what seems to be created by VCs.

  9. ShortTLT says:

    “more cuts to make sure that T-bill yields of 5% are wiped off the face of the earth, so that this competition for VC funds vanishes”

    And so they’re not literally underperforming the risk-free rate of return…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *