“Locked-in” Homeowners Nevertheless Pay Off Below-4% Mortgages: their Share of All Mortgages Outstanding Drops to 55%, Lowest since Q1 2021

Big changes in life, corporate switcheroos from working-remotely-forever to return-to-the-office, job changes, natural disasters, etc., force their hand.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

The share of mortgages outstanding with rates below 3% – as close to free money as regular folks could get – has been declining slowly but steadily to 21.3% of all mortgages outstanding at the end of Q3 2024, from the peak in Q1 2022 (24.6%), according to the Federal Housing Finance Authority’s National Mortgage Data Base of all mortgages (blue in the chart below).

The share of mortgages with rates below 4% has dropped to 55.2% of all mortgages outstanding at the end of Q3 2024, from the high of 65.1% in Q1 2022 (red). This is the share of the total number of mortgages outstanding, not of mortgage balances.

The share of adjustable-rate mortgages dropped to just 2.3% of all mortgages outstanding in Q3, after the spike in interest rates pushed the adjustable rates higher (from a share of over 10% a decade ago). Some ARMs had rates below 3% before 2020, which is why the blue line is above zero before 2020; those were ARMs. And those folks experienced a payment shock when rates began to rise in 2022.

The “locked-in effect” has bedeviled the US housing market ever since mortgage rates went back to the old-normal levels in the era before QE, before 2009. This effect describes a feeling of homeowners with mortgage rates that are well below the current rates, such as 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with rates below 4% and even below 3%. These homeowners obviously rejoice in the deal they got, and many swear up and down that they will never ever give it up.

But they’re also somewhat handicapped if they want to sell their house to buy a different house that they then have to finance at a much higher mortgage rate. Doing the math leads to payment shock.

The real estate industry laments this locked-in effect because it removes those locked-in homeowners both as buyers and as sellers from the market. This explains part of the plunge in demand to where in 2024, sales of existing homes plunged to the lowest volume since 1995, despite sharply rising inventories. This is terrible for the real estate industry and for mortgage lenders and brokers because they earn commissions and fees from each transaction.

But some locked-in homeowners nevertheless sell their homes and pay off their low-interest-rate mortgages for a variety of reasons – big changes in life (divorce, death, etc.); corporate switcheroos from working-remotely-forever to return-to-the-office; new jobs in different cities; natural disasters that destroy the existing homes, etc.

And suddenly, a home with a low mortgage rate has to be sold, or has to be refinanced, and the old mortgage is paid off, and a new mortgage at a much higher rate is taken out.

6%-plus mortgages. Conversely, the share of mortgages outstanding that have rates of 6% and higher has more than doubled to 17.2% at the end of Q3 2024, the highest since Q3 2016, from a share of 7.3% at the low point in Q2 2022.

Obviously, this share of 17.2% is still very low. But the share more than doubling in two years is a rapid increase. It reflects purchase mortgages and refinance mortgages with rates of 6% or higher.

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is currently just over 7% and has been above 6% since September 2022, according to Freddie Mac data.

The below-3% 30-year fixed-rate mortgages occurred only during a short period from mid-2020 to late 2021 (red box), triggering an enormous refinancing boom that by Q1 2022 caused nearly a quarter of all outstanding mortgages to have rates of less than 3%.

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with rates below 4% occurred periodically starting in 2012 during the era of QE when the Fed bought bonds, including large volumes of Mortgage-Backed Securities to repress mortgage rates.

So these below-4% mortgages are not forever. At some point, “locked-in” homeowners find themselves in a position where they want to, or have to, pay off the old mortgage and take out a new mortgage at a much higher rate. And eventually the locked-in effect begins to fade.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.



  15 comments for ““Locked-in” Homeowners Nevertheless Pay Off Below-4% Mortgages: their Share of All Mortgages Outstanding Drops to 55%, Lowest since Q1 2021

  1. Lucca says:

    My mortgage is paid off, but I won’t be selling or buying until prices come down, way down.

    • TennesseeJed says:

      RTGDFA. life happens.

      • Lucca says:

        I did read the article. I was speaking for myself. You sound jealous because my mortgage is paid off and yours obviously isn’t.

    • WClass says:

      In my opinion, you should be selling Before prices come down, and buying After they come down.

      • Paul S says:

        WClass

        If we only had that crystal ball, we could all do that. Wait a minute…..if we all did that no one would ever sell or buy, would they?

        And as the article says, life sometimes happens and people have to sell or move regardless of the market.

        That is why my always and everyday advice is to pay off the mortgage, any mortgage, as quickly as possible. Having no debts is the first step towards freedom, and having rent to pay or a mortgage nut is a millstone until it is gone.

        • Lucca says:

          Good advice and that’s exactly what my spouse and I did. We paid our mortgage off and were able to retire early. But even still, we don’t believe in overpaying for a home, especially for one that is now 300k more than it was four years ago. We don’t care about mortgage rates, since we won’t be needing a mortgage.

  2. Home toad says:

    …did someone say, “hey stupid” why are you paying over 7% on your mortgage. 17% of people are paying over 7% for their mortgage and 55% of people pay below 4%.
    That’s like me paying 4 dollars for a burger while stupid is paying 7 dollars for the same burger.
    I know it’s rude to point out the stupid people but…

    • SOL says:

      Young folks are in a hurry to be grown ups. 7 gets them what they think is a home, but just turns out to be an expensive lesson.

    • BobE says:

      Home toad,

      I see your point but it ignores time.

      If I joined a burger club 5 years ago that guaranteed $4 burgers for 30 years, then the people who didn’t join are stuck with paying $7 for a burger today. Are they stupid to buy a burger? Some say yes but if you really want a burger and have the savings, you have no choice. :-). The Burger Club may become insolvent with too many active members.

      30 year fixed mortgages are the same and distort the market.
      Whoever holds below market mortgages, may also become insolvent.

  3. I guess they’ll have to paid off in 30 years, right? So I guess we’ve got that going for us.

  4. grimp says:

    Watched the new Presidents comments today.

    Interesting but it’s not the cost of apples people are upset about.

    It’s auto insurance ($thousands)
    Homeowners insurance (up $thousands)
    Property taxes (up $thousands)
    etc.

    And the RTO order for fed employess will be interesting. Interesing times

  5. ThePetabyte says:

    Banks love the return to office since its “propping up” the dying CMBS market. Its also a positive feedback loop in shedding low interest rate assets for higher ones. A win win for the banks and a total loss for the common man.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      1. Just q quibble: CMBS are held by investors, not banks. Banks hold the CRE loans outright. But return to the office is not affecting the empty office space on the market for lease, it’s filling office space that companies retained and that was largely unused.

      2. Most of the residential mortgages are guaranteed/held by the government, which packaged them into MBS and sold them to investors. Banks don’t hold a lot of residential mortgages anymore.

    • BobE says:

      Thank you for the excellent article, Wolf!
      It looks like life is happening (death, divorce, disaster, dissatisfaction, and displacement) is happening right on schedule. 7-10 years for divorce, house dissatisfaction, and job displacement (The 7 year itch). That’s why 30 year mortgage rates are based on the 10 year Treasury. It has been almost 5 years since rates were at their lowest. Time flies…

      Regarding Return To Office, the pandemic caused an unnatural sudden transition that happened in less than a year. Office space became empty, restaurants and shops went out of business nearby, and transportation dried up due to lack of customers.

      Bringing office workers back should help with bringing back the empty restaurants and shops nearby. The transportation back into these areas should also recover.

      Who benefits? The banks with their dismal CRE loans, the cities with their sales taxes, and the transportation revenue for parking,
      trains, buses, Ubers, etc.

      The office workers will have more expenses for eating at restaurants, visiting shops, taking any transportation.

      Well, back to my PB&J in my home office(for now)

    • BobE says:

      Thank you for the excellent article, Wolf!
      It looks like life is happening (death, divorce, disaster, dissatisfaction, and displacement) is happening right on schedule. 7-10 years for divorce, house dissatisfaction, and job displacement (The 7 year itch). That’s why 30 year mortgage rates are based on the 10 year Treasury. It has been almost 5 years since rates were at their lowest. Time flies…

      Regarding Return To Office, the pandemic caused an unnatural sudden transition that happened in less than a year. Office space became empty, restaurants and shops went out of business nearby, and transportation dried up due to lack of customers.

      Bringing office workers back should help with bringing back the empty restaurants and shops nearby. The transportation back into these areas should also recover.

      Who benefits? The banks with their dismal CRE loans, the cities with their sales taxes, and the transportation revenue for parking,
      trains, buses, Ubers, etc.

      The office workers will have more expenses for eating at restaurants, visiting shops, taking any transportation.

      Well, back to my PB&J in my home office(for now)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *