CPI Inflation Rose on Food & Energy Prices, even before Gasoline Price Spike. YoY still Pushed Down by Bad-Joke OER

The Bad Joke of Owners Equivalent of Rent (OER) explained.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

The Consumer Price index for February, released today — which does not yet include the gasoline price spike in March — rose by 0.27% (+3.3% annualized) in February from January (blue line in the chart).

The year-over-year increase – which is still, and will continue to be, pushed down by the doctored figures for Owners’ Equivalent of Rent (OER) for September, October, and November (more in a moment) – rose by 2.4%, same increase as in the prior month (red line). OER accounts for 26.1% of total CPI, it moves the needle, and it’s a scandal, a politically-convenient and Wall-Street-convenient scandal, so everyone over there is going along with it.

The energy CPI jumped by 0.63% in February from January (+7.9% annualized). Gasoline prices jumped in February from January, even on a seasonally adjusted basis. The price of utility natural gas piped to the home spiked, as did prices of other fuels used at home, largely propane, heating oil, and firewood, amid a harsh winter in parts of the country. Electricity prices backed off for the second month from the spike that had topped in December.

Year-over-year, the energy CPI was up just a hair thanks to the 5.6% YoY drop in gasoline prices that is now in the process of flipping.

Food prices jumped by 0.63% in February from January (+7.9% annualized). Year-over-year, food inflation accelerated to 2.6%. Food prices are up by 31% from January 2020.

But prices of durable goods, many of which are imported, fell for the third month in a row and were nearly flat for two months before then. So year-over-year, the CPI for durable goods is now essentially unchanged, despite the tariffs. Durable goods are dominated by new and used vehicles.

Core services CPI rose by 0.27% (+3.3% annualized) in February from January, a deceleration from what had been the worst reading in a year. It accounts for roughly 60% of the CPI basket of goods and services.

It includes housing costs (OER and Rent), medical care services, health insurance, auto insurance, tenant’s insurance, subscriptions; telephone, internet, and wireless services; lodging, rental cars, airline fares, education, movies, sports events, club memberships, water, sewer, trash collection, motor vehicle maintenance and repair, etc. It does not include energy services, such as electricity.

Year-over-year, the services CPI rose by 2.9%, as it continues to be pushed down by the CPI for Owners’ Equivalent of Rent (OER), which had been doctored for the September-November period. OER is the biggest component of the CPI basket, weighing 26.1% in overall CPI, and over 40% in core services CPI, and it moves the needle.

The Bad-Joke OER explained.

The Owners’ Equivalent of Rent CPI rose by 0.22% (+2.7% annualized) in February from January.

The issue here is the year-over-year increase that is still getting pushed down by the three doctored months September-November. Year-over-year, the index rose by 3.2%.

OER is based on what a large group of homeowners estimates their home would rent for. It’s supposed to reflect the cost of homeownership as a service.

Homeowners experience a lot more inflation, but it is not reflected in CPI. The expenses of homeownership – homeowners’ insurance, HOA fees, property taxes, and repairs & maintenance – are not included in CPI, and OER takes their place. Those expenses have soared for many homeowners, and inflation is rampant in them, but not reflected in OER.

Many countries, including Canada, track homeowner inflation by the actual costs they pay for homeowners’ insurance, HOA fees, maintenance and repairs, and property taxes. Canada includes an index for mortgage rates and an index for home replacement values. Why can’t the US switch to a system like this? That’s a conceptual shortcoming with OER, it’s a lazy way of bypassing a more complex job – and always has been.

The immediate issue with OER is September, October, and November. In September, the month-to-month increase of OER did a suspicious outlier-plunge, and with no data for October due to the government shutdown and apparently no data for November either, the September outlier was carried forward through November. Since then, the month-to-month increases seem normal, given what OER represents.

But the year-over-year increase is still getting pushed down by those artificially low readings in these three months (circled in blue).

What is getting pushed down by those three months is the index value. It was 430.5 in August. In the four months through August, the index value increased by 1.18 to 1.44 points each month. Then in September there was this outlier when the index value increased by only 0.68 points, roughly half the prior rate. October was officially left blank, but the index value for November is there (432.5), and so we know that in effect, they carried the outlier monthly increase in points (0.68) from September forward to October and November, and combined the two increases averaged out to be 0.70 per month, the excuse being the government shutdown and lack of actual data.

The table shows the OER index value, seasonally adjusted; the changes month-to-month in points and percentages; and the changes year-over-year (not seasonally adjusted) in percentages. Note how the year-over-year increases plunged from +4.0% in August to +3.4% in November.

The index values of these three months that barely increased carry forward in the index value for all times to come. But next fall, they will fall out of the 12-month window of the year-over-year percentage comparison, which is when the year-over-year impact of those three months will vanish.

OER index value MoM change in pts MoM % YoY %
Jan/2025 421.1 1.30 0.31% 4.6%
Feb/2025 422.4 1.27 0.30% 4.4%
Mar/2025 423.9 1.56 0.37% 4.4%
Apr/2025 425.3 1.42 0.33% 4.3%
May/2025 426.5 1.19 0.28% 4.2%
Jun/2025 427.8 1.30 0.31% 4.2%
Jul/2025 429.0 1.18 0.28% 4.1%
Aug/2025 430.5 1.44 0.34% 4.0%
Sep/2025 431.1 0.68 0.16% 3.8%
Oct/2025 431.8 0.70 0.16% 3.6%
Nov/2025 432.5 0.70 0.16% 3.4%
Dec/2025 433.9 1.36 0.31% 3.4%
Jan/2026 434.8 0.95 0.22% 3.3%
Feb/2026 435.8 0.98 0.22% 3.2%

IF OER index values had increased in September through November at the average rate of the months June, July, and August, year-over-year OER today would be +3.6%, not +3.2%.

The CPI for Rent of Primary Residence is dogged by a similar issue, but to a lesser extent. It weighs 7.8% in overall CPI. Together, the two indices weigh over one-third of total CPI!

The core services CPI rose by 0.22% (+2.7% annualized) in February from January. Year-over-year, the OER issue continued to push down core services CPI to an increase of 2.9%.

“Core” CPI, which excludes food and energy components to track underlying inflation, rose 0.22% (+2.60% annualized) in February (blue in the chart below).

Year-over-year, “core” CPI rose +2.5%, also pushed down by the months of the doctored OER (red):

Later today and over the next few days, I will post separate detailed analyses on food inflation, which intensified; and energy inflation, which also intensified even before the current price spike in March; and on inflation for owners and buyers of cars and trucks. So stay tuned.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:




To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.8K other subscribers

  11 comments for “CPI Inflation Rose on Food & Energy Prices, even before Gasoline Price Spike. YoY still Pushed Down by Bad-Joke OER

  1. SoCalBeachDude says:

    MW: Stock-market indexes fall as traders weigh inflation risks and latest Middle East developments

    SPX -0.21% DJIA -0.73%

  2. SoCalBeachDude says:

    MW: The real inflation rate? Try 3.3% — and that’s before the jump in gas prices.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      Yes. The Fed’s preferred and usually lower PCE Price Index was already at 3% for December (latest available). The CPI is really screwed up right now.

  3. SoCalBeachDude says:

    BIG BEAUTIFUL GAS PRICES: Soaring costs to cast long shadow across economy…

  4. Kirk says:

    Imma get on my soapbox here…

    4.4% unemployment ain’t natural. That’s low. What’s your favorite extended period of sub-4.5% unemployment? Post WW2? We aren’t operating on reasonable expectations anymore.

    Sorry folks, ain’t everybody employable. Some job seekers in society, let’s just call it 1 in 20, do not have the maturity or responsibility to be practically employable after we consider the normal hard working people just between jobs. When companies bloat their staff with poor-fit workers, it’s harmful to the company. That’s why when layoffs happen, stock prices go up.

    So what does that have to do with this…? Because the narrative that the Fed rate has to balance unemployment with inflation is a red herring. At 4.4%, we can let unemployment rise out here as it trends 5% and we don’t need to panic about that.

    We can panic about inflation 👍

  5. Eric86 says:

    It seems neither party can get a handle on inflation because neither wants what is necessary: job losses and a recession.

    We did have some of these bumps in late 2024 as well where inflation bounced back up, but I have no clue how we ever get to 2% without a meaningful pullback.

    Just keep rates the same

  6. Eric86 says:

    I want to add, what are wages doing versus PCE?

  7. Brewski says:

    “When you can’t hit the target, MOVE IT!”

    The Fed will tolerate a new level of inflation: 3 Percent

    And watch for another Too Big To Fail event in private equity.

    • Eric86 says:

      If the FED were ever serious about the 2% number, then they would have never lowered rates anytime in the last 4 years.

      Or did ZIRP or any of the other dumb shit they have done.

  8. The Struggler says:

    “Those expenses have soared for many homeowners, and inflation is rampant in them.”

    I have a “special” housing situation in a special market. I definitely have increased costs, both today and on tomorrow’s horizon.

    One is our insurance. Due to some bad timing on quotes and renewals, we were forced into a different, more expensive option.

    Another is the age of our building. It’s a 45 y/o condo complex with 5 units. I’m pretty sure all the exterior is original. Depending how far we go, I am ballparking $200k to redo roof, siding and windows (including skylights).

    The interesting part about MY personal scenario is that I have a “deed restricted unit.” This means they create a small slot for me to fit in, and the ceiling is based on my *purchase price*.

    Of course, that doesn’t rise, but the general cost of living DOES. As does my need for savings (college fund, et al), AND the ongoing investment in the home to keep it tenable.

    I’m anticipating some sort of interaction with the housing authority to address this: how can I be expected to pay $40k in maintenance costs and keep my income and net worth at an uncomfortably low level?

  9. Chris B. says:

    “In September, the month-to-month increase of OER did a suspicious outlier-plunge, and with no data for October due to the government shutdown and apparently no data for November either, the September outlier was carried forward through November. Since then, the month-to-month increases seem normal, given what OER represents.”

    If the BLS was going to make a wild guess for October and November OER, why wouldn’t they do something reasonable or defensible like averaging the previous six months data? Carrying over the “suspicious outlier” of September across three months seems hard to explain without a motive from the BLS acting director who was installed, suspiciously, in August, right before the September outlier number.

    Definitely an “*if you trust the numbers” disclaimer moment.

Leave a Reply to SoCalBeachDude Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *