How the Debt Ceiling Is Now Pouring Liquidity into Financial Markets, only to Suck it Back Out Very Fast Later this Year

Last time, $840 billion got sucked out in 5 months, all from excess cash in ON RRPs. But after $2.26 trillion of QT, ON RRPs are nearly gone.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

Back on April 3, 2025, cash in the government’s checking account, the Treasury General Account (TGA) at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, had plunged to $296 billion, from over $800 billion in mid-February. Then came the flood of tax receipts, and by April 16, the TGA balance had shot up to $639 billion, and by April 30, to $678 billion. Then, the balance began to decline again.

On May 8, the closing balance was already down by $100 billion, to $576 billion, according to the Treasury Department. The flood of tax receipts likely moved the out-of-money date into August. The balance of the TGA got pretty close to zero during the prior debt-ceiling farces, which is about when Congress agrees to lift/suspend the debt ceiling. The TGA is cash parked at the Fed and is a liability on the Fed’s balance sheet. Draining the TGA pulls that cash from the Fed and throws it into the markets. That’s what we’re seeing now.

But note what happened the last two times after the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended: the TGA balance exploded.

The balance in the TGA is determined by the cash inflow from issuance of Treasury debt and collections from taxes, fees, and tariffs, minus the cash outflow to pay for daily outlays and to pay off maturing Treasury securities. The daily inflows and outflows can be huge.

The desired level of cash in the TGA is $800 billion to accommodate those huge daily flows, according to the Treasury Department. Once the debt ceiling is lifted/suspended, the TGA will be refilled pronto.

In 2023, in the six weeks between June 1 and July 11, the government sucked $520 billion in liquidity back out of the financial markets to refill the TGA by issuing huge amounts of T-bills on top of the long-scheduled regular auctions. Then over the next 3.5 months, it sucked another $320 billion out of the markets, $840 billion in total in less than five months.

But back then, that cash came entirely out of the cash that money market funds had parked at the Fed via overnight reverse repos (ON RRPs). ON RRPs essentially represent cash that money market funds don’t know what to do with, and so they place it at the Fed and collect interest.

ON RRPs plunged by $1 trillion in less than five months as money-market funds bought the T-bills that the government issued and paid for them with the cash from unwinding their ON RRPs at the Fed.

Last time when the debt ceiling was suspended, on June 3, 2023, money market funds had $2.2 trillion in excess liquidity parked in ON RRPs at the Fed, some of which they deployed to buy those T-bills that the government issued to refill the TGA.

ON RRPs are a liability on the Fed’s balance sheet, like the TGA. And the cash to refill the TGA essentially came from ON RRPs at the Fed via money market funds and T-bill issuance. From the Fed to the Fed. And markets barely noticed.

This time around, the Fed’s $2.26 trillion in QT has whittled down that excess liquidity in ON RRPs to just $142 billion. And if the TGA gets drawn down to near-zero again, and if Treasury then issues $800 billion in additional T-bills over a few months later this year and early next year, ON RRPs can only provide a small portion of that cash, and the rest of the cash to buy those T-bills will come from the financial markets and the banking system’s reserve balances at the Fed.

That’s what is different this time, compared to the last two times. This time, financial markets are going to notice that $800 billion in liquidity getting sucked out in a short time.

Buying a little bit of time: The large inflow this year by Tax Day pushed out the TGA’s out-of-money day. The tax haul was driven in part by massive capital gains taxes. The S&P 500 gained 26% in 2024 after having already gained 21% in 2023. Investors who sold winners in 2024 had to pay capital gains taxes by April 15. Payroll taxes were also strong, driven by record employment and record high wages. And then in April, $17 billion in tariffs washed into the TGA, up by 81% from March.

All this bought a little bit of time before the liquidity drain on the financial markets begins – assuming that Congress waits again till the last minute to raise/suspend the debt ceiling, rather than doing it, like, right now.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:




To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.6K other subscribers

  23 comments for “How the Debt Ceiling Is Now Pouring Liquidity into Financial Markets, only to Suck it Back Out Very Fast Later this Year

  1. Timelord says:

    Congress should just make a permanent flexible debt ceiling, rather than these continual confrontations we have over them in the political arena, a game of chicken between Republican and Democrat that happens every few years.

    • rojogrande says:

      Doesn’t a “permanent flexible debt ceiling” just mean no debt ceiling? I’m fine with getting rid of this political farce, but we should just say we’re ending the debt ceiling.

      • Brian says:

        The debt ceiling is there to make the politicians think about how much they’re spending beyond their means. It doesn’t actually stop any of them, preferring to kick the can down the road, but at least it keeps the idea of a balanced government alive,

        • cas127 says:

          Brian is 100% right.

          The debt ceiling is a failure as an actual *impediment* to the endless accumulation of federal debt. Because the legislature (for decades) has been willing with flirt with ruin in order to more easily resolve spending conflicts of the day (by borrowing – really printing – more money rather than hashing out a way to live within the means of tax revenue – at whatever level of taxation).

          *But* – without the periodic chaos and rancor of official debt ceiling hikes, pathological legislative dysfunction would be made *easier* – 100% guaranteeing the pathologies would explode.

          You don’t normalize/hide addiction – otherwise you get more addiction.

  2. Bala says:

    Very useful and easy to understand article! As TGA is drawn down to near ZERO over the next three months, and with ample bank reserves at a stable 3.2 trillion, there is a very high chance that RRP balances will begin to increase by large amounts over the next three months. I think we have seen the bottom in RRP at around 40 billion dollars a few weeks ago. If I am right, and the RRP increases by 200 or 300 billion before the Congress
    raises or abolishes debt limit, this increase in RRP may mitigate the pressure on the system when the Treasury refills the TGA. So, keep an eye on the daily RRP balance!

    • Bobber says:

      What if banks hold more T Bills instead of reserves or RRPs?

      • Bala says:

        It is my belief that the money market funds are the big players in RRP. They cannot find a suitable place to invest the marginal dollars elsewhere and the big banks do not want MMF deposits because it causes a diminishing or even a negative return for the money center banks. So, the MMFs park the money at the Fed.

      • Wolf Richter says:

        Bobber,

        Banks don’t hold ON RRPs. They put their cash in their reserve accounts at the Fed because reserves pay more interest than ON RRPs.

        Banks already hold T-bills. But there are regulatory differences between reserves and T-bills.

        Reserves going down is exactly what refilling of the TGA will do, that’s where part of the cash will come from because reserves are cash from bank customers, and if they buy T-bills with their cash, the banks end up with less customer cash, and their reserves will drop. That’s exactly what we mean when we say “refilling the TGA sucks liquidity out of the financial system.”

  3. Cody says:

    Does the Treasury have to refill the TGA quickly? Like a statutory requirement or something?

    Or could they do it slowly, say over 12 months? Or not at all, and simply run with the TGA at close to zero?

    Or could the Treasury do it with 2-7 year coupon bonds in the “belly” of the yield curve?

    Bessant seems like a guy who might think outside of the box on something like this if it’s likely to cause an actual liquidity squeeze. Or is a liquidity squeeze not such a big deal, and the Administration is likely to let it simply happen?

    • Bala says:

      The Treasury likes to keep a balance of 700 to 800 billion dollars. Remember that the US annual budget is around 7 trillion dollars. It is similar to keeping one or two months of your annual expenses in your checking account.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      There is no legal reason. They have to refill it very quickly up to a fairly decent level because it’s super risky to not have enough cash balances to be able to pay off maturing bonds while a bunch of other things need to get paid the same day, and for some reason, revenues are a little slow, for example. That account needs to have a huge cushion to avoid a potential fiasco. That $800 billion is the desired level. They can operate with a lower balance. But it gets riskier the lower the balance goes. It cannot operate with just $40 billion in that account. It would have to kite checks to do that, and that’s hard to do today with electronic payments.

      • Propheticus says:

        There exists the “Unclassified” line item, the last line item, in fact, in the TGA, both on the deposit and withdrawal side of the leger. The deposit side, FYTD, is tiny, at $3.2 billion. However, on the withdrawal side, FYTD, it stands at $168 billion. Any idea what “unclassified” entails and why such a large imbalance? Hookers ‘n blow for the congress, fed, and POTUS on the withdrawal side, perhaps?

        • Wolf Richter says:

          In the Daily Treasury Statement you’re referring to, deposits and withdrawals are classified by department or entity, such as DOD, NASA, SSA, SBA, OPM, Legislative Branch, GSA, FTC, public debt, etc.

          There are also deposits and withdrawals that are not classified by department, so “unclassified.” But they are MINUSCULE, less than 1%, of the inflows and outflows. It’s a catch-all, such as “miscellaneous” or “other,” for stuff that’s too small to bother with on a published report.

          YTD total:
          Deposits: $22,608 billion
          of which “unclassified” $3 billion = 0.01% 🤣

          Withdrawals: $22,918 billion
          of which “unclassified” $168 billion = 0.7% 🤣

          Note that the biggest part of the deposits and withdrawals is the cash flow around the public debt, paying off maturing Treasury securities and issuing new Treasury securities.

      • Andre says:

        Paying off maturing government bonds would be a predictable amount and should be covered by issuing new bonds at a higher interest rate than those maturing.
        Paying off old debt with new and increasing debt at a higher interest rate without cutting expenditure would to my mind be rapidly becoming unsustainable. The so-called debt ceiling in reality does not exist as it is always ignored. Time for congress to cut military and other unnecessary expenses The US faces no risk of invasion by foreign forces

  4. Sameera says:

    So, best to anticipate a big stock market drop later in the year?

  5. Kent says:

    Is there a legal requirement that says the TGA can’t go negative (overdrawn)? It’s not like the Sheriff is going to show up at the front door at the White House. We’ve lost any semblance of fiscal responsibility with overspending and massive tax cuts, not to mention this farce of a debt ceiling and the Fed buying treasuries, why not just take that last step to moral decrepitude? Maybe say it’s for the children or something…

    • Andre says:

      “The last step to moral decrepitude” Are referring to a massive default or just inflating the debt away slowly and hoping that nobody notices?

    • Wolf Richter says:

      INFLATION. Huge amounts of inflation.

      That’s always the result sooner or later when a central bank funds government spending. See Argentina, they have this system.

  6. Kenny Logouts says:

    90 days until China tariff issues kick off again.
    90 days until T bills need selling to stay solvent.

    Could get interesting?

  7. Wolfgoat says:

    Only $17B in tariff income? I thought we were all going to be rich?

    • Tom says:

      Rich??
      I thought the world was supposed to end.
      Tariffs were going to take us back to the stone age. We would revert to hunters and gatheres. Even the Amish would suffer.
      Oh well just fueled up the work equipment for 2.75 gallon.

Leave a Reply to Bala Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *