A Currency on Edge

What’s Causing the Argentina “Blue Dollar” Volatility? 

By Bianca Fernet, Argentina:

After a few months of electoral uncertainty which saw Argentina’s blue dollar, or parallel exchange rate, rise to well over 16 AR$/US$, this week has been volatile. On Tuesday morning, the rate fell to US$14.35, then bounced back to US$14.70 the same day. Today it’s back up above US$15.05 and rising. What’s going on?

A few factors are at play here, but none add up to such a spectacular drop. It is the beginning of the month, meaning banks are again selling “savings dollars” to individuals that meet the requirements. Last week, savings dollar sales were higher than US$374 million to roughly 600,000 individuals, representing a 15% increase over the same period last month. These individuals take these physical dollars directly from the bank to their neighborhood cueva and exchange them ate the blue rate — pocketing the difference.

While this influenced the market, it is not sufficient to account for such a precipitous drop. This has been going on monthly and typically has been accompanied by additional moves by the government to get the blue dollar down. So this month’s sale should not have surprised the market.

The evolution of the Blue Dollar (blue line) and the official exchange rate (green line) against the US dollar:

Economists and news outlets pointed to the “Macri Effect.” As expectations that Cambiemos’ Mauricio Macri may likely be Argentina’s next President rise, so too does confidence that he would make good on his promise to unify the currency market and devalue the official rate to around 14 AR$/US$.

In this scenario, the blue dollar has dropped because holders of physical dollars in Argentina have decided to sell US dollars and buy pesos in their exuberance that Macri may be President-elect in under two weeks. Again, that doesn’t make so much sense. The “Macri Effect” should cause the value of Argentine stocks and bonds to rise, not flood Buenos Aires with physical dollar bills.

For the “Macri Effect” to have a direct effect on the blue dollar, either people currently holding dollars in Argentina would have to suddenly want more pesos immediately (this is unlikely), or people with money outside Argentina would have to transfer the money into the country using cuevas rather than via the Central Bank or using bonds in a contado con liquidacion (ccl) or “blue chip swap” operation. The price to transfer money in and out of Argentina via cuevas has not moved from last week to this week, meaning more money hasn’t suddenly come flooding into the country to buy up property or invest.

Finally, many factors at play should be pushing the blue dollar up. Exporters and commodity products are currently holding their products until after the election and changeover if possible. This has the double effect of depriving the Central Bank of the dollars that exporting the goods would bring in, and the inflationary result of pushing up prices at home.

Multiple news outlets reported anecdotal evidence from owners of cuevas that could explain the sudden drop and subsequent bounce back. Cronista reported rumors that cueva owners intentionally held prices down during the period that “savings dollars” were sold, knowing that people would sell their dollars for a lower price because their economic situations did not permit them to hold the cash and wait for a better price. That is feasible — the blue dollar market is relatively small (estimated around US$25 million per day), so an extra US$300 million over a week is reason enough to cooperate to keep the rate low and exchange fewer pesos for these dollars.

Another rumor was that cueva operators known as pitufos, or smurfs, coordinated efforts to refuse to exchange a US$6 million dollar order for pesos. A US$6 million dollar sale is large for this market and would ordinarily be planned well in advance or processed over a few days to not upset exchange rates.

The reality is that we are days away from a runoff election that will have drastically different ramifications depending on the outcome. That means risk. And risk means volatility. Even if Macri wins the runoff, the volatility will remain as we wait to see if he can deliver on a difficult and risky campaign promise: the quick reunification of the currency market. By Bianca Fernet

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

  3 comments for “A Currency on Edge

  1. Petunia says:

    As the west starts talking about cash going digital they will drive up demand for hard cash where ever it is found. I expect that as the idea of digital currency gets pushed in the west, the currencies of China, India, Brazil, and yes, even Argentina will be in demand. Keep your eye on this trend. Cash is not going away, it will just morph into other available forms.

    • Nick says:

      What makes you think China or India are also not going to digital cash? Indeed, they are further along than the US with the cashless economy.

      • Petunia says:

        Cultures where bribery and corruption are highly embedded are highly unlikely to go fully digital. China and India are two really good examples.

Comments are closed.