High Priests of Global Finance Stoke Emerging Market Fears

“Hot Money” gets cold feet: the 3 Steps to a Panic

By Don Quijones, Spain & Mexico, editor at WOLF STREET.

Two of the most important guardians of global finance, the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the IIF (Institute of International Finance), gave their verdict on the current state of the global economy this week. And their message could not be clearer: beware the dreaded fate of emerging markets.

The World According to A Prestigious Club of Global Banks

The IIF warned this week that hot money is pouring out of emerging markets at a startling rate, primarily on the back of China’s crunching slowdown and rising fears of a looming US rate hike.

Before we go any further, here’s a caveat: The IIF is a prestigious “club of global banks.” After the Club of 30, it is arguably the most powerful financial lobby association on the planet. It is also one of the strongest proponents of self-regulation in banking, a major cause of the Global Financial Crisis. Could an organization like the IIF have ulterior motives?

This year capital outflows from emerging economies will surpass inflows for the first time since 1988. Residents sending cash out of the emerging markets has accelerated amid recent financial market volatility while at the same time foreign investment is set to nearly halve from $1,074 billion in 2014 to just $548 billion this year.

The countries most at risk are those with high current account deficits, pronounced levels of corporate debt denominated in foreign currencies, and extreme political uncertainty. Brazil, whose currency has suffered a 30% currency depreciation this year, and Turkey (15%) are among the nations “in this situation,” the report warns. The nation most at risk is Venezuela, which (according to estimates by US financial firms) is currently suffering annual inflation of 120%. The country’s risk of default is “extremely high” and could even happen as early as 2016, warns the IIF.

The last time such a large amount of hot money spewed out of emerging market economies was at the height of the 2008/09 global financial crisis. This time around, the capital exodus is being driven by internal, rather than external factors, claims the IIF — a rather bizarre claim given that the three most important causes of emerging market woes (China’s rapid slowdown, the abrupt end of the commodities super-cycle, and the strengthening U.S. dollar) are: a) international in scope; and b) beyond the control of emerging market governments or central banks.

Emerging markets’ current predicament would have been unimaginable without the groundwork laid by Western central banks. In a desperate bid to contain (or at least postpone) an endemic banking crisis that they themselves were complicit in fueling, the world’s largest central banks flooded the globe with countless trillions of dirt-cheap dollars, euros, yen, pounds, Swiss francs, and yuan. With most developed economies stalled and their engines flooded, most of this “hot money” went headfirst into fast-growing developing and emerging markets to chase high-yield risks that would have been unthinkable, were it not for the newfound abundance of cheap money.

Hot Money Gets Cold Feet

Now, after years of ZIRP, the mere thought of the Fed raising rates by a paltry quarter-point or two is enough to send already jittery investors into a stampede of terror. As a result, trillions of dollars of hot money are suddenly getting very cold feet, especially amidst rising fears over the prospect of emerging-market governments imposing capital controls.

As Reuters reports, many of the countries involved have past form:

Some governments are already restricting citizens’ ability to move cash freely or tightening existing measures and some foreign investors worry they may be next in line.

As 2015 outflows from emerging stock and bond funds near $100 billion and currencies from Malaysia to Brazil plumb multi-year lows, memories are stirring of past controls that block unlucky investors’ exits.

At stake is the $7 trillion that the Institute of International Finance reckons has flowed into emerging markets since 2005, via direct investments, mergers and acquisitions, and stock and bond purchases. Some of those with EM exposure may be considering moving before regulators do.

A statement this week by IMF President Christine Lagarde that emerging markets will probably see even more volatility ahead is unlikely to help matters. This volatility is not just being fueled by investor sentiment and fears over capital controls. They are also the result of a sharp increase of dollar-denominated corporate debt.

In its latest Global Financial Stability Report, the IMF estimates that between 2004 and 2014 the emerging markets’ total corporate debt load grew from $4 trillion to $18 trillion:

Debt held by firms in emerging market economies in a currency other than their own poses extra complications these days. When the U.S. Fed does eventually raise interest rates, the accompanying further strengthening of the U.S. dollar will mean an emerging market’s own currency will depreciate against the higher value of the U.S. dollar, and would make it increasingly difficult for firms to service their foreign currency-denominated debts if they have not been properly hedged.

If the initial phase of this interminable Global Financial Crisis taught us anything, it is that very few players are “properly hedged”.

A Three-Step Process

Right now the biggest problem for emerging markets is confidence. Fear, like greed, is highly contagious and fearful funds can move at lightning pace in today’s highly globalized, financially liberalized world.

Financial crises are becoming increasingly common as the global economy becomes increasingly interlinked, Paul Krugman warned back in the year 2000. Most emerging market crises tend to be generated by a self-fulfilling process of capital flight (due to a large pool of extremely mobile funds, the “hot money”), balance sheet calamities (because local firms hold large debts in foreign currency), and panic (as investors succumb to individually rational but collectively disastrous fears).

The fears are being stoked, whether intentionally or not, by the high priests and priestesses of global finance. Sound familiar? It’s playing out right now across numerous national economies. And once the process begins, it’s very difficult to stop. By Don Quijones, Raging Bull-Shit.

A secluded private courthouse in Washington DC is currently the scene of a gargantuan legal battle that could have serious ramifications for all of us. Yet virtually nobody knows about it. There’s no trial, no judge, and no jury. Read… Corporation vs. Nation: The Ultimate Showdown

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

  4 comments for “High Priests of Global Finance Stoke Emerging Market Fears

  1. Nick Kelly says:

    Oh, it’s the IMF’s fault that Venezuela is a basket case, with serial offender Argentina not far behind. Ulterior motive? Of course, Lagarde has long been secretly short the BRICS using as a front the son- in- law she also buys pot from.

    Seriously, anyone who knows anything of the history of Latin America knows you don’t need a deus ex machina to explain the endless crises, in the case of Argentina and Peronism , crises preceding the existence of the IMF.
    In the Buenos Aires province of Argentina, not long ago it was determined that HALF the work force worked for the government.
    Were they brewing beer, milking cows, etc.? No- they were in ‘administration’
    Unfortunately for this scenario, we fundamentally inhabit a barter system, made more efficient with money but still a trade. But who wants to trade their brewing or baking for administration? Apart from bribes that is.
    As a result the price of ACTUAL goods inflates as the government prints money to pay its army of civil servants.
    Important point: when the civil service approaches 30 % of the work force, it forms a voting block that is almost impossible to dislodge at the ballot box.
    This could be called the Argentine disease- vote for me and I”ll give you a job. The sacred cow called democracy is for sale.
    As in Greece it ends when the cash machines run out of money.
    God only knows what Argentina would owe if it was in the euro zone and milked it at the Greek rate. You wouldn’t get much change from a trillion.
    But Venezuela is really scary- theoretically part of the developed world,it is now one of the most dangerous places in the world ( outside an actual war zone- that comes later)
    Former bus driver Maduro has threatened to expropriate, not just mining interests, not just banks, but also the corner stores, who to survive must charge real prices not political prices.
    This society may actually collapse into a Zaire type failed state, where the law of the jungle takes over.
    To quote Hippocrates when diagnosing a disease: ‘When you hear the sound of hooves do not think of zebras’
    No conspiracy theory or IMF plot is required to explain the plight of these places.

    • d says:

      Vote for me and I”ll give you a job??

      Do you not mean vote for me to keep your job??

  2. d'Cynic says:

    Could this outflow of hot money from EM trigger the holy grail of central banking, inflation in the so called developed economies?

    • randombypasser says:

      If i need to, i will bet no it would not, for three reasons.

      First, as long as the supply of goods stays around the same, which now is around enough, and the supply of tool for exchange, the money, grows then the logical outcome is not inflation.
      Second, as long as the price for the money stays very low, or even negative, there will be no good reason to demand higher prices for goods supplied.
      Third, the demand for higher yields from processed goods runs hand in hand with price competition and well ahead of the raw materials, so the deflationary shock first hits the raw materials producers and with that the producers higher up on the ladders can compete with the prices before taking hit too hard.

      The scenario does not include anything else, like the employment situation, possible rises in salaries, strikes, disasters, global political changes, anything.
      Without other than mentioned variables i would bet against inflation.

      But i’m just a regular joe from the hood pondering of the ladders and butterflies…

Comments are closed.