If the US Deficit is ‘only’ $483 Billion, why does the Government Have to Borrow $1.1 Trillion to Fill the Hole?

On Wednesday, the Treasury Department released its Monthly Treasury Statement for September and the fiscal year 2014. It’s the official account of how the US government arrives at its infamous deficit. And it was a doozie.

Without giving it a second thought, the media gushed about the headline number, how good it looked, how the US government was getting its fiscal mess in order.

Receipts rose $247 billion to $3,021 billion, outlays rose $50 billion to $3,504 billion (including “on-budget” and “off-budget” items) for a deficit of $483 billion. At 2.8% of GDP, as the media gleefully pointed out, it was proportionately the smallest since 2007. The deficit monster has been tamed. And unthinkable as that seemed a couple of years ago, it has disappeared as a political issue, even before the election!

There is just one teeny-weeny problem:

To fill that $483 billion hole, the US government borrowed $1.086 trillion.

Turns out, the US gross national debt, as I’d reported in early October, ended fiscal 2014 at 17.824 trillion, up $1.086 trillion from fiscal 2013. This is the real increase in real Treasury debt that real taxpayers will have to deal with in the future.

The chart of the gross national debt below is a mesmerizing picture of America’s fiscal condition as it developed over the years, with some peculiarities:

One, the US, had four years of official “surpluses” between 1998 and 2001 that at one point exceeded 2% of GDP. They should have brought down the gross national debt by the amounts of the surpluses. But not these “surpluses!” Instead, the debt increased in every one of those four years, in total by $394 billion. That’s how much real debt it took to cover these government accounting “surpluses.”

Two, following four years of “surpluses,” the debt began to grow exponentially. Since 2002, the government has borrowed $12 trillion, or two-thirds of the total debt! Since 2008, it has borrowed $8.8 trillion, or about half of the total debt.

Three, in fiscal 2014, with that smallish deficit of $483 billion, well, look what happened: the debt soared by $1.1 trillion.


We’re shocked and appalled.

Are they lying to us here in the land of open and transparent governance? Well, they’re not actually lying. They’re using government accounting. It’s like corporate accounting: a purposeful mix of revelation and obfuscation.

Part of the discrepancy is a result of last year’s debt ceiling charade. In March 2013, Treasury debt hit the ceiling set by Congress. To fund the government deficit, the Treasury Department borrowed from other accounts to be repaid later. “Extraordinary measures,” it was called. On October 17 last year, so in fiscal 2014, after Congress and the White house had agreed on a deal to avoid default, the gross national debt jumped by $328 billion in one fell swoop. Since most of it was spent in fiscal 2013, we can subtract it from the $1.086 trillion debt increase in fiscal 2014, which brings it down to $758 billion.

In the same vein, the debt jumped on October 1 – the first day of fiscal 2015 – by $51 billion, which kicked that portion of the debt increase into fiscal 2015. So, to get a better feel for fiscal 2014, we add it to the $758 billion debt increase. Hence, $809 billion (more on that below).

And then what happened?

Government accounting. On page 3 of the Treasury Statement, under the bottom line of “Total On-Budget and Off-Budget Financing” of $483 billion – so the official deficit – there is a section with three more lines, called “Means of Financing.” It explains the mega-difference between the official deficit and the official increase in the debt.

It states right there, in clear text:

“Borrowing from the Public”: $797.6 billion. That’s how much the Treasury admitted it borrowed in fiscal 2014 to cover the deficit of $483 billion; one line beneath the other. Pretty close to my estimate above of $809 billion. So let’s go with the Treasury’s number. And how was that $797.6 billion in newly borrowed money used?

  • $483 billion of it covered the official deficit. Got it.
  • $69.9 billion was ascribed to an “Increase in operating cash.” Ok, makes sense.
  • And the remaining $244 billion in borrowed money? That’s the doozie. It’s in the last line labeled “By Other Means.” It’s over 50% of the “deficit.”

But it’s NOT included in the deficit.

That line doesn’t shows up again. After a brief appearance of how $244 billion was borrowed from the public and loaded onto future taxpayers, it disappeared from the statement into a complex web of government accounting to never be seen again by the public.

But it’s part of the deficit, as much as it is part of the debt. With it, the US deficit in fiscal 2014 amounted to $727 billion – over 50% higher than the stated deficit of $483 billion.

That’s one way to solve a nagging problem.

OK, I get it. Government accounting, like corporate accounting, is designed to pull a bag over our heads. We minions don’t need to know these silly details. This is the equivalent of Wall Street: don’t dig through the footnotes, just buy, buy, buy! It works with the mainstream media which abounded in praise for the economy and the government’s adroit fiscal management as the deficit is withering away before our very eyes. At this pace, pretty soon, they’re going to discuss once again how to spend the “surplus.”

Theories abound why this is suddenly happening, after years of deceptive calm. Read…  Toxic Mix Blows up: Oil Price Collapse & Junk Bond Insanity

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

  8 comments for “If the US Deficit is ‘only’ $483 Billion, why does the Government Have to Borrow $1.1 Trillion to Fill the Hole?

  1. NY Geezer says:

    Until mid-2008 I accepted the argument, although with some skepticism, that the high US deficit produced a drag on the econony and for that reason the high annual deficit increases needed to be trimmed. I never accepted that repayment of the debt was a genuine issue.

    But since the bailouts of wall street the annual defict increase rate is much higher. Yet, I hardly hear anyone talk about trimming the deficit, except those who continue to harp on trimming social security and medicare and ignoring bailouts.

    Now $244 billion doesn’t have to accounted for as if it is too trivial to matter. If that $244 billion is trivial how could a similar amount of social program expenditures be an important budget item?

  2. LG says:

    Wolf,when was the last time you went golfing? Cost of golf balls
    has risen astronomically. Not to mention “caddies” that are now has to also qualify as federal government interns!
    “Change you can believe”

    • Vespa P200E says:

      Ask Obola as he got to play 200 rounds of golf in 6 yrs – all paid by taxpayers plus his pals.

      Now that is the change the lemmings were led to believe…

      • sheldon lebowitz says:

        Ike played many more rounds while, Commander in Chief, of golf than “Obola” did in his whole life. Ike, being a popular Repukeican, had no one using trash talk to degrade him.

  3. NotSoSure says:

    You know the answer to this. “A couple billion here, a couple billion there, and pretty soon we’ll be talking about some serious money.”

  4. Vespa P200E says:

    Well was watching PBS News Hour last night and of course Kool-Aid drinking government owned PBS gave lot of air time to Timmy’s replacement Jokester Lew and another joker who is budget office head or something exhorting the low unemployment and drum roll please deficit is shrinking! Hey how about that thanks to tax increases but of course they gave the credit to Obola.

  5. marmico says:

    And the remaining $244 billion in borrowed money? That’s the doozie.

    Not really. The feds typically acquire (increase) their financial assets yearly. Think, for example, borrowing for student loans (a liability) and repayment of same (an asset).

    See 2013 Flow of Funds, Table F105, line 26.

    The feds have close to $2 trillion in financial assets. Analysts should pay more attention to net deficits/debt.

    • BigDog says:

      So all is Fine and Dandy…in your book, Marmico???
      Sounds awfully fishy to me!

Comments are closed.