ON RRPs Drop to Near-Zero $17.9 Billion, Liquidity Flow into Markets Over, while TGA Refilling Drains Liquidity from Markets

Liquidity now begins to drain out of the markets for the first time since the debt ceiling.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

ON RRPs fell to $17.9 billion today – essentially near zero compared to the peak range of around $2.3 trillion that prevailed from May 2022 through June 2023 – and the lowest since early April 2021 when huge amounts of QE were beginning to wash into ON RRPs. In normal times, these Overnight Reverse Repurchase agreements are zero or near-zero. But QE wrecked the normal times. The blue line in the chart denotes the current near-zero level.

This has big implications for liquidity flows out of financial markets. ON RRPs, now being near zero, can no longer supply any noticeable amount of liquidity to the financial markets. But the government’s checking account, the Treasury General Account (TGA), is still getting refilled after the debt ceiling and is still draining liquidity out of the financial markets.

ON RRPs, refilling the TGA, and QT.

ON RRPs represent excess liquidity in the financial markets. They’re used mostly by money market funds to deposit extra cash at the Fed. They’re a liability on the Fed’s balance sheet, and the Fed currently pays 4.25% interest on ON RRPs.

ON RRPs are used mostly by money market funds that have to invest in high-quality short-term instruments. Money market funds have many other options, including Treasury securities with less than one year to run, commercial paper, and lending to the repo market. They will shift funds to where they can earn a little more and still satisfy their liquidity needs.

Other approved ON RRP counterparties are banks, government-sponsored enterprises (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc.), the Federal Home Loan Banks, etc.

The spikes in the chart occurred at quarter-end and at year-end for window-dressing purposes. There are also smaller spikes at month-end.

When ON RRPs rise, being a Fed liability, they have the effect of draining liquidity from financial markets; and when they fall, the have the effect of adding liquidity to the financial markets.

ON RRPs have been falling since the end of the debt ceiling, thereby adding liquidity to the markets, just as the refilling of the TGA drained liquidity from the markets.

But ON RRPs are now near zero – where they are in normal times – and cannot fall much further, and cannot add much more liquidity to the market, so this influx of liquidity from ON RRPs into the markets has run its course. But the draining of liquidity via the refilling of the TGA continues.

The TGA is being refilled after the debt ceiling drained it down to $260 billion. Refilling the TGA back to the desired level of $800 billion requires that the Treasury Department sells even more Treasury securities at auctions than is needed to just cover the deficits and refinance maturing securities. Financial markets have to come up with this extra cash to absorb those Treasury securities needed to refill the TGA.

Refilling the TGA thereby drains liquidity from the markets. But the ON RRPs provided much of that liquidity. With ON RRPs now down to near-zero, the rest of the cash to refill the TGA back to $800 billion will come from the markets.

The TGA balance, at $690 billion at close of business on September 2, is still over $100 billion shy of the desired level, and as the TGA gets refilled to around $800 billion, those amounts get drained from the financial markets.

The massive surge of ON RRPs starting in 2021 was the result of the Fed’s QE that created so much liquidity that markets didn’t know what to do with it, and when it was even a little more profitable to deposit this liquidity at the Fed, they did, and ON RRPs ballooned to a range of $2.3 trillion back in 2022 through June 2023.

The subsequent plunge in ON RRPs is largely a result of the Fed’s QT, which has shed $2.3 trillion in assets from the balance sheet. Most of the QT has come out of ON RRPs so far – meaning that QT has so far only drained excess liquidity.

But ON RRPs are now near-zero, the additional liquidity needed to refill the TGA plus the additional QT will come out of reserves, which represent liquidity that banks have deposited at the Fed. Reserve balances were still at $3.22 trillion as of Thursday’s balance sheet. And they should now begin to decline under QT and the refilling of the TGA.

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:

WOLF STREET FEATURE: Daily Market Insights by Chris Vermeulen, Chief Investment Officer, TheTechnicalTraders.com.

To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.8K other subscribers

  11 comments for “ON RRPs Drop to Near-Zero $17.9 Billion, Liquidity Flow into Markets Over, while TGA Refilling Drains Liquidity from Markets

  1. good technical piece. thanks wolf

  2. Vladamir says:

    Ok, call me a moron…we all know what QT is.
    You tell what TGA is in your SECOND paragraph:
    So, what the heck is ON RRP’s??
    I kinda-sorta figured it out in the first paragraph. Still not 100% sure.
    How would you like it if I walked into the room and started speaking Russian with you?

    • Wolf Richter says:

      1. Read the text below the first chart. Paragraphs 3-9 explain exactly what ON RRPs are, including their position on the Fed’s balance sheet, and what they do, and who uses them.

      2. Since many WOLF STREET readers know what ON RRPs are — there are countless articles on this site about them going back many years — I cannot clog up the first 2 paragraphs with a detailed explanation about ON RRPs for the readers who don’t know what they are. But I give that explanation in paragraphs 3-9.

      3. It helps to read the entire article before commenting. At least read beyond the second paragraph.

    • Rick says:

      I trust you figured out the acronym ON RRP = Overnight Reverse Repurchase agreements. This is basically “parking” money for a few hours.

  3. Ross says:

    What does this mean practically for the bond market? Sounds like more pressure towards higher yields because the market has to absorb the balance? Could the fed decide to reverse course on QT later this month? Sorry. I’m stupid.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      Draining liquidity from the markets would take fuel away from the stock market.

      “Could the fed decide to reverse course on QT later this month?”

      No.

      But several of the Fed chair candidates, including current Board member Christopher Waller and former Board member Kevin Warsh, have spoken out for increasing QT or against decreasing QT (Waller dissented when the pace of QT was reduced in June) and want to shift the Fed’s holdings from MBS and long-term notes and bonds to short-term T-bills. Even the rate cutters want to continue reducing the balance sheet.

  4. Mr. Naive says:

    Back to normal ON RRPs = good
    Continuing to refill the TGA = bad, at least in the short term

    What are the possible consequences? Is this just filling the coffers before the inevitable raising of the debt ceiling? Won’t it put upward pressure on interest rates? How does this impact Fed policy? I’m so confused.

  5. SSK says:

    Does it push up long yields or only short yields?

  6. TJ from DET says:

    $2.3 Trillion has been drained during QT, yet we’re just back to the starting point? That’s insane to reflect on. More QT is likely required to offset the years of excess before anything resembling a balanced market can occur too. Crazy.

    • Bob B says:

      The market cap of the S&P500 is over $50T. The total US housing market is valued around $50T.

      Nvidia’s market capitalization has reached $4 trillion, making it larger than the GDP of many countries, including the United Kingdom and France, and it represents about 3.6% of the global GDP. If Nvidia were a country, it would rank as the fifth largest in terms of GDP, following the U.S., China, Germany, and Japan.

      So $2.3 trillion is pocket change… a rounding error to all those 400+ Economic PhD’s at the Fed who gave us ZIRP, ZIRP, and more ZIRP.

      But we need a rate cute?

  7. matt says:

    Finally!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *