Fed’s Nightmare: CPI Inflation in Core Services Worst in 6 Months, Pushing Core CPI to Worst in 6 Months. Some Goods Prices Fell, Others Rose

The shocker for the 2nd month was the re-acceleration of inflation in core services, the biggie, accounting for 60% of overall CPI.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

Core services move the needle. They include housing costs, medical care, health insurance, auto insurance, tenant’s insurance, subscriptions; telephone, internet, and wireless services; lodging, rental cars, airline fares, education, movies, sports events, club memberships, water, sewer, trash collection, motor vehicle maintenance and repair, etc. And that’s where inflation re-accelerated sharply for the second month in a row.

Core services accelerated to 4.5% annualized in July from June (+0.36% not annualized), the worst in six months, and the second month in a row of sharp increases, and it wasn’t housing costs that did it (blue in the chart).

The three-month core services CPI accelerated to 3.2%, also the second month in a row of acceleration (red).

While everyone was busy searching with their magnifying glasses for signs that tariffs are getting pushed into consumer goods prices – there was a mix of price increases and price declines – it was in services where inflation took off again behind their backs, and services are the biggie.

Year-over-year, core services accelerated to 3.65%, the second month in a row of acceleration.

In terms of goods, many of which are tariffed: New vehicle prices remained unchanged after declining for three months in a row. Prices of used vehicles, which are not imported and therefore not tariffed, continued to rise which they’ve been doing for a year. They’re big contributor to durable goods inflation. Apparel, footwear, and jewelry remained unchanged for the month and were down year-over-year. Household furnishings and supplies rose 0.7% for the month and by 2.4% year-over-year. Consumer electronics fell 1.4% for the month and by 5.9% year-over-year.

Food price dipped month-to-month, and gasoline prices fell.

Durable goods prices rose by 0.36% (+4.5% annualized) in July from June, after remaining essentially unchanged in June and falling in May. Year-over-year, the CPI for durable goods rose by 1.2%.

The surge in used vehicle prices has been a big contributor to the price increases of durable goods.

Major durable goods categories MoM YoY
Durable goods overall 0.4% 1.2%
New vehicles 0.0% 0.4%
Used vehicles 0.5% 4.8%
Household furnishings (furniture, appliances, floor coverings, tools) 0.7% 2.4%
Sporting goods (bicycles, equipment, etc.) 0.4% -1.3%
Information technology (computers, smartphones, etc.) -1.4% -5.9%

The durable goods CPI had spiked by 25% during the free-money era. Then in mid-2022, prices declined for two years through August 2024 (negative CPI). But from September on, prices began to inch up again.

This chart of the price index, not the percentage change, clarifies just how violently prices spiked during the free-money era, how they declined for two years, and how they’ve inched higher from the low point last August.

New vehicles CPI was unchanged in July from June, seasonally adjusted, and year-over-year was nearly unchanged (+0.4%).

The price level remains below where it had been in all of 2023 and in the first part of 2024.

The spike during the free-money era, which resulted in massive historic profits for automakers and dealers, drove prices to the economic limit beyond which higher prices kill demand, and prices cannot be raised without sacrificing sales, and automakers know it, and disclosed in their earnings warnings that they’re eating the tariffs. Meanwhile, they’ve started to work on shifting more production of vehicles and components to the US to mitigate the impact of tariffs – which is what tariffs are supposed to accomplish.

GM, which makes a large portion of its US-sold vehicles in Mexico, China, South Korea, and Canada, and moved much of its supply chains overseas, is among the hardest-hit. Tesla and Honda, whose vehicles are among those with the most US content, are among the least hit.

Used vehicle CPI has been rising since mid-2024, after the long drop from the historic spike.

In July, prices rose by 0.48% from June (+5.9% annualized), seasonally adjusted, after four months in a row of declines.

Not seasonally adjusted, the used vehicle CPI has increased steadily since mid-2024 (blue line).

Year-over-year, used vehicle prices rose by 4.8%, the seventh month in a row of year-over-year increases, and the biggest one yet.

Apparel and footwear are largely imported and tariffed. The CPI for apparel and footwear inched up a hair by 0.07% month-to-month and was down 0.2% year-over-year.

The chart shows the price level (not the percentage change).

So far, companies have eaten the tariffs because prices are already high after the spike in 2020-2022, when consumers were willing to pay whatever, and retailers made record huge profits. But now the free money is gone, and consumers are ticked off about high prices and are not willing to pay whatever again. In this environment, if retailers raise prices, they lose sales.

“Core” CPI, which excludes food and energy components to track underlying inflation, accelerated to +0.32% in July from June (+3.9% annualized), the worst in six months.

The driver was the core services CPI, which totally dominates the core CPI. Durable goods prices, which had been pushing down core CPI in the prior months, increased in July, instead of pushing down core CPI, and that made matters worse.

The 3-month “core” CPI accelerated to +2.8% annualized, the worst since March (red).

The overall CPI, which includes food and energy, rose by 0.20% (+2.4% annualized) in July from June.

Drivers behind this deceleration were the sharp month-to-month drop in energy prices and the drop in food prices.

The 3-month CPI rose by 2.3% annualized, a slight deceleration from June.

Year-over-year price changes:

  • Overall CPI: +2.7% (gold), same as in the prior month, and both were the worst since February.
  • Core CPI +3.1% (red), the third acceleration in a row and the worst since February.
  • Core Services CPI: +3.65% (blue), the second acceleration in a row and the worst since March.

Housing components of core services.

Owners’ Equivalent of Rent CPI decelerated to +0.28% (+3.4% annualized) in July from June.

The three-month average decelerated to +3.5% annualized.

OER indirectly reflects the expenses of homeownership: homeowners’ insurance, HOA fees, property taxes, and maintenance. It’s the only measure for those expenses in the CPI. It is based on what a large group of homeowners estimates their home would rent for, with the assumption that a homeowner would want to recoup their cost increases by raising the rent.

As a stand-in for homeowners’ expenses, OER accounts for 26.2% of overall CPI and estimates inflation of shelter as a service for homeowners.

Rent of Primary Residence CPI accelerated a hair to +0.26% (+3.1% annualized) in July from June, the second acceleration in a row.

The 3-month rate continued to decelerate, to +2.8% annualized, the lowest since mid-2021.

Rents are no longer the driver of services inflation; the drivers of services inflation are now in other services.

Rent CPI accounts for 7.5% of overall CPI. It is based on rents that tenants actually paid, not on asking rents of advertised vacant units for rent. The survey follows the same large group of rental houses and apartments over time and tracks the rents that the current tenants, who come and go, pay in rent for these units.

Year-over-year, OER rose by 4.1%, continuing the deceleration, but still substantially higher than before the pandemic (red in the chart below).

Rent CPI (blue in the chart below) rose by 3.5%, continuing the deceleration. It is now back in the range that prevailed before the pandemic.

The table below shows the major categories of “core services,” and include food services. Combined, they accounted for 64% of total CPI:

Major Services ex. Energy Services MoM YoY
Core Services 0.4% 3.6%
Owner’s equivalent of rent 0.3% 4.1%
Rent of primary residence 0.3% 3.5%
Medical care services & insurance 0.8% 4.3%
Food services (food away from home) 0.3% 3.9%
Motor vehicle insurance 0.1% 5.3%
Education (tuition, childcare, school fees) 0.4% 3.5%
Admission, movies, concerts, sports events, club memberships 0.7% 4.4%
Other personal services (dry-cleaning, haircuts, legal services…) 0.5% 4.5%
Public transportation (airline fares, etc.) 3.0% 0.7%
Telephone & wireless services -0.1% -0.5%
Lodging away from home, incl Hotels, motels -1.3% -4.8%
Water, sewer, trash collection services 0.4% 5.3%
Motor vehicle maintenance & repair 1.0% 6.5%
Internet services 0.0% -2.4%
Video and audio services, cable, streaming -0.3% 2.2%
Pet services, including veterinary 0.4% 6.0%
Tenants’ & Household insurance 1.0% 5.8%
Car and truck rental -2.9% 0.7%
Postage & delivery services 0.4% 3.1%

Food Inflation. 

The CPI for “Food at home” dipped a hair (-0.1%) in July from June (-1.4% annualized), but rose 2.2% year-over-year.

Since January 2020, food prices have surged by 27%.

Beef has been a culprit for years and has become extremely expensive as US cattle herds have dropped for a slew of reasons to a 64-year low.

Overall beef prices spiked by 1.5% in July from June and by 11.3% year-over-year.

For example, the average price of a pound of ground beef spiked by 2.2% month-over-month (+29% annualized) and by 13.8% year-over-year, to $6.25.

Since January 2020, the average price of ground beef has spiked by 61%. This is a years-long issue:

Coffee spiked by 2.3% for the month and by 14.5% year-over-year. Since mid-2021, when this price surge began, the CPI for coffee surged 41% following global commodity coffee prices:

But egg prices continued to plunge for the fourth month in a row, as they unwind their avian-flu-driven price spike.

For example, the average price of a dozen Grade A large eggs dropped another 3.9% in July from June, to $3.60, bringing the four-month plunge to 42%.

But they’d spiked so much during the avian flu period through March that even after this four-month plunge, they’re still up 16.4% year-over-year and by 146% from January 2020:

MoM YoY
Food at home -0.1% 2.2%
Cereals, breads, bakery products -0.2% 1.0%
Beef and veal 1.5% 11.3%
Pork 0.5% 1.1%
Poultry -0.1% 3.1%
Fish and seafood 0.4% 1.7%
Eggs -3.9% 16.4%
Dairy and related products 0.7% 1.5%
Fresh fruits -1.4% 1.3%
Fresh vegetables 1.2% -0.8%
Juices and nonalcoholic drinks -1.3% 1.5%
Coffee, tea, etc. 1.2% 8.6%
Fats and oils -1.5% -1.4%
Baby food & formula 0.9% -2.3%
Alcoholic beverages at home 0.1% -0.2%

Energy.

The CPI for gasoline fell by 2.2% in July from June, seasonally adjusted, to the lowest level since mid-2021.

Year-over-year, the gasoline index fell by 9.5%. Lower oil prices are the driver. Gasoline makes up about half of the overall energy CPI.

The CPI for energy overall fell by 1.1% month-to-month and by 1.6% year-over-year.

Despite the ups and downs, the index has essentially been flat for two years, but at much higher levels than before the pandemic.

CPI for Energy, by Category MoM YoY
Overall Energy CPI -1.1% -1.6%
Gasoline -2.2% -9.5%
Electricity service -0.1% 5.5%
Utility natural gas to home -0.9% 13.8%
Heating oil, propane, kerosene, firewood 1.0% -2.1%

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:

WOLF STREET FEATURE: Daily Market Insights by Chris Vermeulen, Chief Investment Officer, TheTechnicalTraders.com.

To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.7K other subscribers

  61 comments for “Fed’s Nightmare: CPI Inflation in Core Services Worst in 6 Months, Pushing Core CPI to Worst in 6 Months. Some Goods Prices Fell, Others Rose

  1. Waiono says:

    Great job Herr Wolf …as usual!

    Long term bonds responding as expected.

    • Rick Vincent says:

      Fascinating to watch the longer term yields today- Wall Street cheering more free money coming soon; and long term yields saying “You just wait!”.

  2. rodolfo says:

    Who is it that keeps harping on the danger of services inflation? And continues to be correct?
    Our beloved Mr Wolf.

  3. SG says:

    Why is inflation in services spiking ? Any thoughts ? Pricing power since consumer goods can always be sourced from low cost destinations (with tariffs maybe inflation will show here too but there are alternatives) ?

    • David says:

      The cost of doing business, especially the insurance and legal/compliance costs are skyrocketing. That is percolating through everything. At least from personal experience.

  4. ShortTLT says:

    Utility natgas to the home nearly +14% yoy, yet Henry Hub can’t even get above $3/mmBTU.

    The underlying commodity is deflationary, but the SERVICE to provide it to your home keeps getting more expensive.

    • ryan says:

      Thanks to the Utility Commissioners who give their permission to boost rates because utilities are experiencing the impacts of inflation (wages and their costs for materials), the main product they buy however is seemingly the issue…

    • 4hens says:

      Passing on the costs of data center buildout to ratepayers.

  5. Evan says:

    I’ve never been a conspiracy theorist, but it’s pretty clear the “asset class” has full hold of MSM in both parties. All of the sudden 4.2% unemployment that’s pacing our increasing dependency ratio, lower immigration is a catastrophe. And inflation is “on target” despite upward trends in the sticky parts over the past 3 years.

    Energy kinda saving the day. One time relief though, as Brent can’t really go lower (rig count is already trending down).

    I don’t care to debate if current policy is good/bad, but its is inflationary (either transient or permanent): Lower net immigration, large deficits, a weakening dollar (as a import country).

    The bond market is acting as it should at least. There are some adults left that aren’t addicted to quick fixes.

    • Waiono says:

      Evan,
      You don’t have to be a a “theorist” when it’s as plain as the nose on your face. There have been numerous comments here about the massive increases in insurance. The MSM touts “climate change”. I’ve never heard regulatory capture described as climate change but whatever works, right?

      “According to AM Best, property casualty insurers made a record $169 billion in profit in
      2024—even as they raised prices and pushed for laws to avoid paying more claims, all
      while claiming the industry was in trouble.1
      The $169 billion profit amounted to a 90% increase from the previous year and a 333%
      increase from 2022.”

      • David says:

        This. Insurers just whisper climate change to commissioners and all their hikes are approved.

      • Idontneedmuch says:

        Biggest scam ever!

      • Prairie Rider says:

        I enjoy watching sports on television. It seems that the biggest spenders for commercials during broadcast sporting events in the USA are the insurance companies.

        The English Premier League football starts this Friday. There, bookmakers are the biggest advertisers. Many team’s players have bookie’s logos on their jerseys.

        George Orwell wrote in Nineteen Eighty-Four, “Films, football, beer, and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds.”

        Same as it ever was.

    • Jackson Y says:

      With slowing population growth (from lower birth rates and lower immigration levels, both legal & illegal), the labor market no longer needs to add as many jobs to hold the unemployment rate steady. Jerome Powell explained this during July’s press conference.

      But Wall St sees a NFP report below +100K jobs and screams “WE NEED RATE CUTS!”

      • Bob B says:

        Wall Street wakes up and screams WE NEED RATE CUTS before they even get out of bed.

        • 91B20 1stCav (AUS) says:

          …got out of bed, or waking after passing out on the money bar?

          may we all find a better day.

    • TSonder305 says:

      It is really incredible. The entire media apparatus, political left and right, are on board with creating horrible inflation and stealing from savers in order to maintain high asset prices. I’ve never seen anything like it.

      Their ability to outright lie (tariffs are showing up in inflation, inflation easing, data supports a September rate cut, etc. etc.) in order to support their position is unmatched.

      The last thing the Fed wants is to cut rates and see long-yields go up again. They’ll end up with real egg on their faces if that happens, as I suspect it will.

      • Depth Charge says:

        It’s because both parties are funded by the billionaire and hundred millionaire asset holders, and the crooked politicians are getting rich beyond words themselves.

        Why has nobody bothered to ask how “public servants” who entered CONgress with net worths of less than $100k end up multi-millionaires with net worths in the mid to upper 8 digits?

        The American people are being taken for a ride, and it’s accelerating.

      • TSonder305 💯💯💯

    • NBay says:

      Like they say, “I’m not saying it’s true, I’m just ASKING if it may be”
      Kinda like “Do you still beat your wife?….just asking”

      Anyone else think Wolf may get a shortage of his upper 50% data to play with in his articles soon?….just asking.

    • ShortTLT says:

      Brent is European crude. What you want to look at is WTI, which is currently at approximate parity (5.6x) with Henry Hub natgas on an energy-equivalent basis.

      When the price of oil is significantly higher than 5.6x the price of natural gas, then the market is signaling a potential shortage.

  6. 209er says:

    Thank You Wolfmeister.
    Prost ! 🍻

  7. Jackson Y says:

    It was not a great CPI report. Every category went up except for energy, whose 1.1% drop offset all the other categories, yet headline CPI still increased by 0.2%.

    TTM Core PCE will likely be around 2.9-3.0%, almost a full percentage point above target, and drifting above the sticky ~2.7% level it’s settled at since May 2024.

    Yet the cheerleading financial media spun it as “not as bad as feared,” sending the NASDAQ up another 1% today.

    I don’t know how any reasonable central banker who isn’t beholden to politics and/or Wall St can say with a straight face it’s time for more rate cuts.

    • sufferinsucatash says:

      Greenspan and Shiller are having a press conference at 6:30 am Tomorrow. Watch for the briefcase

  8. ryan says:

    Reuters headline, “Stocks rally, oil prices drop after modest US inflation data solidifies Fed rate cut expectations”. Interesting

  9. Not Wolf says:

    Just need the “free money from tariffs” to start flowing now and everything will be back to normal
    /s

    • Wolf Richter says:

      I blow off most of the Trump-said stuff in the headlines. And I’m not taking the tariff rebates stuff seriously either. But if they do come to pass, and free money arrives once again in households across the US, all bets are off in terms of price spikes. Free money is toxic. It turns brains to mush. We went through that in 2020 and 2021.

      • Depth Charge says:

        Lest we ever forget that this massive inflation was STARTED by this admin back in 2020. This guy is a massive money-printer.

        • sufferinsucatash says:

          Well technically it was to fix the frozen markets.

          It’s documented in the book trillionaire dollar triage

          Handouts are a classic economist tactic going back to antiquity. It’s on page 23 section b of the playbook.

        • 91B20 1stCav (AUS) says:

          sufferin – I have requested it repeatedly at the library, but the first time I was told it was in the ‘restricted stacks’, and the second that it had been removed from the collection because, if read, it might show the nation in an ‘unfavorable’ light…

          may we all find a better day.

  10. rpc says:

    Its not a conspiracy when its broadcasted in headlines on CNBC

    S&P 500 hits new record as CPI report gives Fed green light to cut rates: Live updates

    And even better.

    Trump threatens Fed chair Powell with ‘major lawsuit,’ demands interest rate cut

    • Seeking Cassandra says:

      Yes, that CNBC headline is another example of the unbelievably delusional ZIRP zeitgeist that continues among various agenda-driven factions and some parts of the media. This group of regular readers here is very thankful for Wolf’s ongoing coverage of this topic, accurately sourcing and aggregating the relevant data, then packaging it in a logical, unbiased presentation. Meanwhile, where is our new generation of bond vigilantes?

    • danf51 says:

      It’s interesting to realize how similar phenomenons FDR and Trump are. Both were disrupters.

      Both often hold conflicting views and pursue conflicting policies simultaneously.

      Both often say one thing while doing another. Both had tremendous power of voice. FDR was the radio president, Trump is the social-media, media as entertainment president.

      Both presidents believed they could charm everyone into doing what they wanted. FDR in particular had this absurd notion that Stalin liked him (a kind of pathetic Sally Fields mentality). Trump in a somewhat similar vein thinks he can speak reality into existence by the simple force of his personality.

      Out of the chaos both helped create, there emerged some correctives but also the seeds of new disasters.

      Maybe it’s really the best we can hope for from “democracies”.

      • Computer keeps spinning says:

        FDR – helped lead the fight against totalitarianism, with particular focus against the Nazis and Japanese.

        Trump – Love letters to the leader of North Korea, whose major ally is China. History praising and staying out of the way of Putin, whose main allies are North Korea, China, and Iran.

        Yes, clearly no daylight separating Trump and FDR… 😂

        • Publius says:

          Please list Trump’s policy changes toward North Korea. None. The sanctions he’s lifted on Russia? None. Compare the number of military actions he’s ordered versus Biden. Has he talked about freer trade, closer ties with China? No. My opinion of him isn’t high, and he certainly blows hot and cold, but it takes serious spin to paint his policies as favorable to the nations you list.

        • Publius says:

          * military actions toward Iran

        • rojogrande says:

          It makes you wonder which president put an entire race of people in concentration camps by Executive Order…

    • sufferinsucatash says:

      lol threaten the lawyer with a lawsuit.

      That’s like threatening a fish you’ll throw it in water.

  11. Gazillion says:

    So some people decide to go to target to get their kids some school supplies and get wasted in the parking lot…an aggrieved vax patient wants revenge on the CDC, CEO wasted in broad daylight, cutting basic food security for veterans via snap programs, deficits out the eyeballs and debt ridden empire….government is the great teacher to the plebes…empires last about 250 years…the USA got lucky it had 2 oceans protecting it and largest economy by 1900….

  12. spencer says:

    Economics is an exact science. It’s just that the Ph.Ds. graduated with a minor in mathematics / statistics, instead of a minor in accounting.

    The distributed lag effect of money flows are more or less mathematical constants. Friedman and Schwartz proved this. September should be the peak in the price level, reported in October, a market inflection point.

  13. Alba says:

    Wow, there must be a lot of grumpy folks with 15% inflation in coffee… I have a strong addiction to Peet’s beans, which I can only get every few months on account of being outside the country. I’m sure it’s going through the roof now, so will need to find an adequate substitute soon.

  14. phillip jeffreys says:

    Wolf….what likely impact would FR increases in interest rates have on service sectors inflation? Granted, a lotta assumptions built into any answer.

  15. Frank says:

    Thanks Wolf. Awesome. “The shocker” phase had me chuckling. As, the Fed, politicians, etc, are intentionality & failingly focused on MOM % rate; so they can then apply the wrong policies. Meanwhile, in the real world, consumers, corporations, institutions, charities, focus on “their cost-price vs income, today”. Cost on food, energy, and services are up by ~30%. So the real world will raise wages or prices, if they can, or be forced to make other adjustments. Income inequality graph indicates the income-class reactions and strategies: such as: who is raising wages/prices vs those making adjustments; and also the ‘who and why’ that demands/loves more and more government deficit and debt; or the central bank initiatives. And as taxes are mostly excluded from inflation, its noteworthy that this too is a “price inflation”; and long term, if ~25% of taxpayers pay ~70%/90% of the taxes, we know which groups are headed for de-incoming; fleecing; as they are not covering the combo of inflation plus taxes plus risk rate returns.
    IMO: The high level of: greed, incompetence, gas lighting, fiduciary fail, corruption, are extrordinary. What were missing is adults in the room, or legislated political accountability. Salvageable? Too late? IDK

  16. AK47 says:

    How well is this data understood by the FED? Markets pricing in a 90%+ chance of a rate cut that seems to have no business taking place.

    Trump obviously doesn’t understand how the FED works, begging for an interest rate cut so people can “buy homes”, without realizing they don’t control long-term rates, and cutting will likely increase mortgage rates since inflation is hot.

    This report was terrible, but the market responds positively. How long can we drink the kool-aid?

    • Computer keeps spinning says:

      What makes you think he doesn’t understand that a fed rate cut would drive long term rates up?

      Trump loves having a villain, and right now he’s got that.

    • sufferinsucatash says:

      I love how you question the fed.

      They invented most of the things. And England showed us the rest.

    • Trucker guy says:

      “This report was terrible, but the market responds positively. How long can we drink the kool-aid?”

      Until finances start to bury people. I’ve lost nearly 50% of my annual income in the past few months. I’ve fully checked out on spending anything other than on the cheapest food and gas money. Glad I didn’t buy a house with my covid inflated wages. I’m making less hourly than I was at the end of 2020. Went through and sold off every material possession in the last year. Saw the writing on the wall and believed it. Know a few more people in the trucking world losing their shirts. 3 of them are weeks away from declaring bankruptcy. Trucking has often been the canary in the coal mine. And it’s a bloodbath right now.

      I can’t believe I’m working for a place that cheats me out of several hundred dollars each paycheck and barely breaking 23 dollars an hour with no OT for 65-75 hours a week running hazmat. But I can’t get anything else. Seriously considering going to the oilfields and being homeless again living out of the truck.

      Said I’d never work for a place that shorted your paycheck. Said I’d never work non-hourly again. Said I’d never go back to sleeping in a truck. Never say never I guess.

      Once the job markt goes to crap all this sugar high free money nonsense will come to an end. Glad I got some money back quickly for all my junk before the boat started sinking. I’d hate to be selling used cars, toys, and motorcycles in a severe recession.

    • TSonder305 says:

      I can’t tell if the markets “pricing it in” is to encourage retail investors aka bagholders to jump in so the big boys can unload their overpriced NVDA and TSLA stonks or if it’s to try to force the Fed’s hand.

      The problem is, the Fed knows that premature rate cuts can lead to the 10 year going up, which they don’t want. That’ll require more short term issuance games by the Treasury, which ultimately is a risky endeavor.

      So they’re going to have to decide whether they want to displease Wall Street or tarnish their legacies.

  17. George says:

    Hey Wolf, WHAT IF you were suddenly nominated to take over the BLS and report cost of living changes every month? How would you change things? (If you actually decide to answer this question, do a blog post instead please!)

    Personally I think CPI is inadequate/broken but I have no idea how to fix it.

  18. ambrose bierce says:

    I call this the Avocado economy. Tariff or no tariff, there are no more Mexican Avocados in my store. There have been California avocados, which are more expensive to grow, and consumers won’t pay $3 for a $1 avocado. If the store tries to raise prices that much they end up with guacamole. The last time I went to the store, no Ca Avo, no Mex Avo, the Avo’s are from Peru. Can’t imagine the shipping costs, but it seems as though the main market suppliers of Avos are either shutting down, or this is pass through selling, or they are putting Peru stickers on Ca and Mex avocados. Probably no bureaucratic oversight this is an administration of smoke and mirrors, bribery and corruption. If they can’t control the flow of pass thru avocados the price of illegal merchandise will undercut legitimate markets. Perhaps a bit more complicated for car makers but they can smuggle in components as well. They need to control inventory, so you want a car you order it and wait. Then cross your fingers that the computer board assembled in some off market sweat shop doesn’t malfunction.

    • Wolf Richter says:

      Purchased at Costco: 1 bag of 6 big Haas avocados $9.99 at the SF store two weeks ago, not sure where they’re from. They had lots of them. They also had organic Haas avocados, which I didn’t buy.

      I now see them online Costco Instacart for $9.07.

      Went through my receipts:

      Paid $11.99 on May 17, 2025, so the price plunged since May.

      Paid $9.99 on Nov 9, 2024. So now prices are back to November.

      Paid $8.99 on Sep 7, 2024.

      Paid $7.99 on Apr 13, 2024.

      Paid $6.99 before then. I was already shocked by the price increase each time. That’s when prices spiked.

      Did some checking with the California Avocado Commission. Their price tables show producer prices peaked in March 2025 at $1.87 per pound. By May, they were down to $1.49 per pound, latest data available. In 2024, the price peak was August at $1.67 per pound. In 2023 and through January 2024, they were in range of $0.80 to $0.95 per pound. So wholesale prices spiked by 100% between 2023 and 2024, and retail prices followed, and you didn’t complain, and now that tariffs are putting downward pressure on avocado prices again 🤣, you blame the tariffs???

      Your Avocado-economy theory is ridiculous BS. Did anti-tariff BS cause your brain to fog up?

  19. banana republican says:

    I read that the Fed’s inflation mandate is “zero per centum.” Meanwhile, the Fed’s “dual mandate” is price stability and max. employment. I don’t know where that “2% inflation target” came from, but using the rule of 72 (72/2)=36 years to halve the purchasing power of your fiat dollars ($).

    Question: What are the consequences – to the Fed – of exceeding their “zero per centum” inflation mandate, and “two per centum” target? We all know what the consequences are at our level as spenders and savers.

    From: Fed Balance Sheet QT: -$19 Billion in July, -$2.32 Trillion from Peak, to $6.64 Trillion
    by Wolf Richter • Aug 7, 2025

    Fed balance sheet total: $6.64T
    U.S. Treas. securities: $4.20T – direct debt monetization
    MBS: $2.12T – “saving” the housing market and economy thrice since the GFC

    A couple more questions: Didn’t the Fed say at one time that they would zero out their balance sheet? I guess they’re working on balance sheet normalization, but it seems unlikely that they’ll ever get to zero. Is it legal for the Fed to purchase MBS?

    Couldn’t the Fed (aka U.S. Gosplan) and the FFR be replaced by the U.S. Treas. 2 yr. note yield? They certainly haven’t done the U.S. economy and those not holding assets any favors. Just the opposite, in fact. Central planning always fails.

    Finally, an opinion: If the Fed tries to cut the FFR (short-term rates) in a fiscally dominant, inflationary environment – like now – then that would only result in rising long-term rates, such as the U.S. 10 yr., 30 yr. bonds. The Bond Vigilantes, and not the Fed, still control long bond yields. Reference: September, 2024 right before the November Presidential election.

    Of course Congress is worser with a $37T national debt while the reckless spending continues. And yet “we the people” keep voting for more of the same. Did I get that right?

  20. random50 says:

    This is mildly OT, but it’s surprising hard to find an answer. How do these tariffs actually work? All the commentary I’m finding suggests:

    Example, iphone $599 retail cost without tariff. With tariffs of 145%, it’ll be $1467.55.

    Surely that’s not the method applied?

    • random50 says:

      Personally, I would have thought the tariff gets applied to the cost of the import, which will be a fraction (often a small one) of the eventual retail cost. But every commentary source seems to be applying it to the full retail cost. Am I misunderstanding?

Leave a Reply to Wolf Richter Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *