US LNG has been billed as a game changer, threatening to end Russia’s control of the European market.
By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com:
Despite years of effort from the EU, Russia’s grip over natural gas supplies in Europe is tightening, not waning.
Gazprom shipped 190 billion cubic meters of natural gas to Europe in 2017—a record high, according to Bloomberg. In 2018, that figure is expected to dip slightly to 180 billion cubic meters, which will still be the second most on record.
The higher reliance on Russian gas may come as a surprise, not least because of the ongoing tension between Russia and some European countries on a variety of issues. Russia’s intervention in Ukraine and its annexation of Crimea in 2014 led to a standoff between Russia and the West—but Europe’s imports of Russian gas are up more than 25 percent since then, despite a lot of rhetoric in Brussels about diversification.
There has been some progress. U.S. LNG has begun arriving on European shores for the first time, promising to compete with Russian gas. Importing LNG has been a lifeline particularly in some areas that are acutely exposed to Russia’s gas grip. Lithuania began importing LNG, offering an alternative to Russian gas and forcing price concessions from Gazprom.
For years, U.S. LNG has been billed as somewhat of a game changer, threatening to end Russia’s control of the European market. There have been some notable concessions from Gazprom—more flexible pricing, for example, and an erosion of oil-indexed pricing—but the Russian gas giant has not lost market share. A lot of U.S. LNG has been shipped to Latin America, not Europe.
Part of the reason is that European natural gas production continues to fall, leaving a void that Russia has been eager to fill. At the same time, Gazprom’s Deputy Chief Executive Officer Alexander Medvedev told Bloomberg that coal prices are expected to rise a bit in 2018, making Russian gas more competitive.
Meanwhile, Russia is not leaving the LNG game to the Americans. Russian President Vladimir Putin recently inaugurated the start of the Yamal LNG project in Russia’s Arctic, a massive $27 billion LNG export terminal developed by private Russian gas company Novatek that was completed on time and on budget.
The global LNG market is dominated by Australia and Qatar, while the U.S. will increasingly grab market share as new terminals come online in the next few years. But Yamal LNG puts Russia on the map, and Russia is aiming to control 15 to 20 percent of the global market, according to the FT. “Starting from today, the number of people who have never heard of us will decrease dramatically,” Leonid Mikhelson, CEO of Novatek, said. “Russian gas will be marketable on the global arena.” Russia does export some LNG from Sakhalin in the Far East, but Yamal is positioned to service Europe as well as Asia.
Then there is the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, a proposed project that will double the capacity of the existing line that runs from Russia to Germany via the Baltic Sea. The project is vociferously opposed by some Eastern European countries, as well as the United States, but it has the support of Germany. If completed, it will lock in even more market share for Russia.
All of this isn’t necessarily a huge threat to European energy security as long as supplies are secure. The threat of alternatives from other LNG suppliers could keep Gazprom honest. The price concessions offered thus far are evidence that Gazprom will need to remain competitive in order to hold onto market share. At a minimum, the availability of LNG weakens the threat of a cutoff of supply from Russia. And as crude oil prices rise, the practice of linking gas prices to oil will probably continue to weaken.
But overall, Russia remains the dominant supplier of gas to Europe, despite years of promises from European politicians to diversify. Few see that changing anytime soon. Russia’s share of the European market will rise to 40 percent by 2035, up from 30 percent now, according to an estimate from BP. By Nick Cunningham, Oilprice.com
US oil exports boom as OPEC cuts production. Read… The Biggest Oil Story of 2017
Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:
Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.
According to my google-fu, Yumal is adding 16.5 million tons per year…. which sounds like a lot….. yet, “the U.S. will add 66.2 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity by 2019”.
Also, Qatar is fast-tracking a 30% expansion of their nat gas exports. Russia is desperately playing catch-up.
US shale oil & gas production is extremely high-cost and has only been possible thanks to ultra-loose monetary conditions that have encouraged risky lending practices. It’s indicative that shale corporations in the US have never turned a profit in any fiscal year under any price thus far. The rosy forecasts from the EIA, are just that, rosy forecasts.
As for Qatar, their intent is to raise production from 77bcm, to 100bcm in the next 7 years, something which remains to be seen.
Moreover, demand for gas is steadily rising globally, which means that these volumes will in all probability find buyers.
Russia is far and away the world’s largest energy exporter and they will be growing their market share in the coming years thanks to their boundless reserves and low costs of production.
Congratulations to Russia, it’s a great feat to construct in that location and under the tough circumstances. Also, Chinese investment was instrumental in moving this forward.
25 bcf sounds like a lot until you look at what Russia exported to Europe last year: about 190 bcm. Or 250 times more than the whole of American LNG exports.
Meh.
American LNG will make some domestic companies rich – still fat from clear these will male.any difference in Europe. Asia, on the other hand…
It’s all rather laughable that EU countries are thinking that the US could become a reliable long term supplier of gas using fracking. I can understand if in the short term countries might want to take advantage of the competition offered by US LNG exports to get a better price, but if they are thinking they will be able to use the US as a long term supply source for energy they are seriously deluding themselves.