But is the bounce to be trusted?
By Bill Bonner, Chairman, Bonner & Partners:
“The Donald” breathed a sigh of relief. He and other rich people got a break from the beating they’ve been taking: Stocks bounced, with the Dow ending yesterday’s session up more than 600 points.
But is the bounce to be trusted? And are there better, more tangible, alternatives to investing in stocks? We’ll try to answer both questions in today’s update… We’ll also respond to a reader’s feedback on Mr. Trump in today’s Mailbag.
Yesterday’s bump confirms the mainstream view: There is nothing to worry about. The recent sell-off is just a case of nerves, not a sign of an epizootic. Here is U.S. Trust, a private bank for the ultra-wealthy, reassuring its customers:
The action in the past few days has been based on fears that we will revisit the market environment from 1997 to 1998, in which the Asian currency crisis led to a sizable correction in world equity markets. A second breakdown in energy, a continued fall to record‐low prices in many commodities, and a deep drop in emerging market currencies and equities are sparking fears that a global growth recession is coming our way. And add to that the fact that investors are worried that the Federal Reserve may tighten into a large-scale slowdown is increasing the flight to safety.
U.S. Trust, like Donald Trump and much of the media, blames the Chinese for the recent sell-off. Emerging market economies are slowing, they say, as the U.S. and developed economies are moving into “higher gear.”
Higher gear? As near as we can determine, the gears have been stripped.
But let’s turn back to the Chinese. How come they’re downshifting?
Well, it appears they borrowed too much, overbuilt, and over-speculated – just like Mr. Trump. And just like the U.S. Here’s what Jim Walker, the chief economist of the Asianomics Group, a leading economic research firm based in Hong Kong, told colleague Chris Lowe for the latest issue of Bonner & Partners Investor Network:
China has just gone through the most astounding credit binge in history, and most of it at a tremendously misplaced interest rate. So it has major, major capital restructuring to undertake over the next few years.
Our perspective is that China will be lucky to grow its GDP in the range of 3% to 5% a year over the next two to three years. And that is an upgrade from us, because we used to expect Chinese annual growth in a range of between 0% and 4%.
Now that Mr. Market is giving investors a lesson, the Chinese authorities are desperate to close the schools – just as the feds are in the U.S.
Mr. Trump should be delighted with the Chinese. At least they still have some tools available for more mischief. Their key lending rate is 4.6%; in the U.S. it has been near zero for six years. And China’s leaders are willing to do anything – no matter how absurd – to keep their stocks overpriced. They’ve even made it a punishable offense to say anything about it.
No kidding. Our analysts in Beijing have to watch what they say for fear of being arrested.
This shows that the U.S. is a more advanced economy; when it comes to misleading investors, we rely more on fraud and less on force. But, hey, let’s cut the Chinese a little slack; they haven’t been running a market economy for long. They still have a lot to learn.
For example, when you falsify prices – by manipulating markets – you do not make stocks more valuable. You simply make them less attractive to sensible investors.
In the short run, price increases look like good news. Investors give each other high fives. Commentators blab about the “strength of the economy.” And the public believes it is better off. But mispricing capital assets is a sophomoric mistake. As we have seen – in China and the U.S. – it draws real resources into dumbbell investments and overproduction.
In the U.S., we have more shopping malls than we need. In China, they have too many factories… airports… roads… and cities (We are, of course, just guessing; only Mr. Market knows for sure. And in both places he has been gagged by the central government.)
The real problem in both economies is too much debt (and other debt-like claims on output). Debt has distorted the economy and the capital structure, leaving overcapacity in some key industries and overinflated asset prices – stocks, bonds, and real estate – almost everywhere. And now that Mr. Market is beginning to speak his mind, the authorities are rushing with more gauze and duct tape.
A Better Alternative to Stocks
Recently, in New York, friends asked our advice.
“Should we invest in the stock market?”
The question came from people who have been quietly buying old houses and commercial property in the Tivoli area of upstate New York, where we’ve been staying. They then fix them up and rent them out.
The area, as near as we can tell, is attracting more and more weekenders from New York City… and holding on to quite a few hipsters and philosophers recently graduated from Bard College. It is “up and coming” – with good restaurants and bars, attractive 19th-century Hudson Valley architecture, and a relaxed small-town feel to it.
When asked to give us numbers, they replied:
“Well, things around here are getting pretty expensive. But we can still buy an old house for $180,000… put in about $30,000 in repairs (they do much of the work themselves)… and rent it for $2,000 a month.”
This sketch of their business was not detailed enough to calculate a precise return on investment. But the figures sounded good to us.
“If I were you,” we said, “I’d just keep doing what you’re doing. You’re getting a decent return on your money. And it is less crony-dependent than the stock market.
“You understand what you’re doing. You control your time and your investment. You don’t need Janet Yellen or the Chinese central bank to protect your investment.
“You’re probably buying as cheap as anyone and spending less than your competitors on renovation and maintenance. You’re not likely to do better than this in the stock market.
“Besides, your investment in stocks could disappear. This isn’t going away.” By Bill Bonner, Chairman, Bonner & Partners
It’s Not Just China You Should Be Worried About. Read… Wall Street is Running out of Time… and Money
Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:
Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.
This kind of a market retracement is expected. Looking at a chart of the Nasdaq from 1998 to 2001 it too went through a major rebound for a short time after the initial selloff, before crashing through the floor. The Dow in 2008 was a bit different because it double topped, but the end result was precisely the same. Short of negative interest rates or QE4 I suspect this is the beginning of the end of the latest Fed induced bubble cycle.
The reminds of the movie Titanic where people with the third class tickets were trapped because the the elites had chained the gates of the below decks. It didn’t end well for most of them and I suspect this time will be no different.
“But we can still buy an old house for $180,000”
must be nice, every year even that “modest” price seems more out of reach and i live where a starter home is $500K+
i just had a customer whine about the price of a project and his estimate on what the price level should be is more in line with 1986 than 2015.
Where I’m you can rent a 2 bedroom home for $2,000/month. And that is suburbia, not a resort location. Rents increased about 12% over the last year. But I personally don’t think it can keep up that pace.
Mr. Bonner’s advice sounds correct. A bird in the hand…?
The only way this makes any sense is if that capitol belongs to you. If you are borrowing and economic collapse occurs, your entire investment is a house of cards.(meaning all your years of investment are gone!) Now that scenario is the same for every mortgage holder as well. So what’s my point? If your currency was flipped into something that stores value,.. then while you may have no house, you may have food and a modest shelter verses a box and a sign saying food please.
Stocks are the same as going to a casino and blowing your load. Great fun, but the next day you have the hang over. Since property has become a suckers game, I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone. The government loves a good sucker and so do the banks. Anyone that really does any analysis on the expenses of property ownership will have to agree, even if reluctantly. Then there is the whole tenant landlord thing, read up on that one! Hope you like petroleum jelly.
All one need do is ask to recall to memory 2008 and the housing bubble. Your 250k house almost overnight couldn’t be liquidated for 100k. So the big question, was it ever worth 250k? Next question, did your taxes go down when the bubble burst and you found your 250k house more likely worth 100k? I will say it again, real estate is a suckers investment.
Buying your own place is one thing, seeing real estate as an investment vehicle is like saying I’m going to be a rock star. It can be done, but the risk is high and the costs and obligations are as well. The idea of holding your investment vehicle in your own hands is spot on but i don’t agree with it being real estate.