The End of the Great Debt Cycle

By Bill Bonner, Chairman, Bonner & Partners:

“It’s the end of the great debt cycle,” says hedge fund manager Ray Dalio of Bridgewater Associates, taking the words out of our mouth.

Bond fund manager Bill Gross adds context:

In the past 20 to 30 years, credit has grown to such an extreme globally that debt levels and the ability to service that debt are at risk. […] Why doesn’t the debt supercycle keep expanding? Because there are limits.

Neither Mr. Dalio nor Mr. Gross nor we know precisely where those limits are. But the Europeans and the Japanese are rushing toward them.

A Poke in the Eye for Lenders

In Europe, bond yields are lower than they’ve ever been. Between $2 trillion and $3 trillion in sovereign and corporate bonds now trade at negative nominal yields. We don’t need to tell you that it is unnatural and perverse for lenders to accept a poke in the eye for giving up their valuable savings. But that’s just part of the perversity of the present system – no real savings are involved. The money never existed in the first place. Getting a negative yield seems almost appropriate, if nevertheless incomprehensible.

Today, banks create “money” from thin air, in the form of new deposits, when they make loans.

As our friend Richard Duncan explains in his book The New Depression: The Breakdown of the Paper Money Economy, by the turn of the new millennium the reserve requirement – whereby banks are forced to hold some cash or gold in reserve against new loans – was so low that it played “practically no role whatsoever in constraining credit creation.”

That means as long as banks meet regulators’ capital adequacy requirements, they can create as much new money (loans) as they want. No risk of mining accidents. No need for anyone to sweat or strain. No self-discipline or forbearance required. Savers can eat their cake. And borrowers can have it too.

Doomed Public Finances

Economists who still have their wits about them – if there are any left – are baffled.

The lowest bond yields in history… and along comes the European Central Bank with a plan to drive them lower by way of €1.1 trillion ($1.2 trillion) of QE. What is the sense of it? No one can say.

Rather, no one wants to admit that the real motive is to relieve banks of their bad debt. Banks bought the debt of bankrupt European governments. Everybody knows there is no way governments will pay it back. Fortunately, when central banks buy government debt, it is effectively canceled – forgotten forever. So, the ECB helpfully exchanges this bad debt for new bank reserves before the public catches on.

Over in Japan the government has been running budget deficits for 25 years – funded largely by Japanese “salarymen” who think they are saving money for their retirements. What a disappointment it will be when they discover that the money was not saved at all, but spent by their government.

And now, Tokyo’s debts have grown so large that 43% of tax receipts are required just to service its debt, to say nothing of the amounts needed for current and future deficits.

You can imagine how far you’d get if you tried this at home. Try living on 57% of what you earn (the rest goes to pay your creditors), while still spending more than your income. See how long that would last…

The Japanese are too polite to mention it, but their public finances are doomed. And it can only be a matter of months – okay, maybe years – before the entire Ponzi scheme blows up.

Tokyo… Then Harare

Since 2009, we’ve been saying that our itinerary was likely “Tokyo… then Harare.” By that, we meant that we were probably going to experience a Japan-like deflationary slump… and then a Zimbabwe-like hyperinflation.

We are now in year six of that slumpy, lumpy, bumpy ride. The US economy has been growing, but it is the weakest postwar “recovery” on record. And what little growth we saw was in asset prices. And it was bought with about $4 trillion in central bank stimulus. Few people realize it, but this also retarded real economic growth.

You can see that by looking at the difference between what has happened in the financial markets and what has happened in the real economy. Wall Street is as bubbly as ever. But Main Street is still struggling. Real wages and real business investment, for example – things that mark and measure genuine prosperity – are as limp as a Tokyo noodle.


Prosperity depends on savings and capital formation. You have to devote real resources to new output capacity. You have to hire people and find new and better ways of doing things. But business investment has gone down since 2007. Based on fourth-quarter figures from 2007 and 2014 and annualized, $400 billion was invested in business development in 2007 against only $300 billion in 2014.

Borrowing Binge

Meanwhile, businesses borrowed about $3 trillion more. Where did all this money go?

It appears to have gone into share buybacks, mergers and acquisitions, bonuses, fees and other speculator payoffs. These things benefit the 1% of the 1% – the insiders who are in on the deals. They do nothing for the real economy, except deprive it of the capital it needs to make real progress.

In 2000, we had a bubble in tech stocks. In 2007, we had bubbles in finance and housing. Now, we have bubbles in corporate bonds ($14 trillion)… securitized auto loans ($20 billion)… and student loans ($1.2 trillion).

Pop… pop… pop – that’s what will happen to these bubbles.

And when it does, it will complete our travel to Tokyo. That is when our slumpy ride turns into a terrifying train wreck. Yes, Tokyo deflation before we get to Harare hyperinflation. Stay tuned… By Bill Bonner, Bonner & Partners

Where is that old and tattered “Crash Alert” flag? Read….  Get Ready for a “Zero Returns” World

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

  3 comments for “The End of the Great Debt Cycle

  1. Julian the Apostate says:

    A trillion here and a trillion there, and pretty soon it adds up to real money.

  2. interesting says:

    “The US economy has been growing”

    Not my US economy, this is the worse start to a year since 2007, my customer base is a bit larger than then so at least i won’t almost go broke this time…..hopefully.

    And i don’t get this hyperinflation story one bit, i can’t really afford anything right now since my prices haven’t (i make good money…..for 1997) budged for 15 years, the price of shit can climb to the moon and i’ll still not be buying. The only way i could ever afford a house in socal is prices drop by 60% or my income triples….or some combination of both.

    most people i know here are working jobs that they could never afford the house they live in on the income they make……

    my .02

  3. NY Geezer says:

    Once interest rates on sovereign debt and some blue chip companies reached 0%, I did believe that they could go no lower. I was obviously incorrect since some European governments and blue chip companies are in the process of testing how far below 0% they can go. Its great for them since it is a new risk free income stream. I’m sure they never thought even in their most bizarre dreams that they would be paid to borrow money.

    In Europe it appears that the driving investment force is the desire for the return of most of one’s capital. European bond investors appear willing to lose up to a couple of hundred basis points annually if they are guaranteed the return of at least 98% of their capital. However, before accepting even a half percent annual bond loss they likely looked around the globe for a better risk free deal. Why are they not waiting for the US Fed to raise rates?

    But what would support the hyperinflation contention here? In a world in which nobody displays faith in anything but currencies while gambling with stock prices there is nothing that will ignite even the mild inflation that the Fed has sought for years. So how does the author think hyperinflation will take hold? He really does not explain how in his view this will happen.

Comments are closed.