By Bianca Fernet, Argentina
In Argentina, soy is far more than a dietary staple. It’s a political battleground that pits farmers against the administration of President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner. And currently Ms. Fernandez is going to war with soy farmers for “hoarding” their product. Her weapon? Requiring the tax agency (AFIP) to report sales of silo bags used by these farmers to store grain.
When Argentina defaulted on its sovereign debt back in 2001, it became extremely difficult and costly for the country to raise money by selling bonds. The recent technical default has exacerbated this lockout from the international capital markets, and the holdout “vulture” funds are deftly blocking attempts to circumvent the ruling.
Argentina’s inability to access foreign currency via capital markets necessitates that it rely on exports for foreign currency. But there in lies the rub – Argentina has this inconvenient parallel currency problem that becomes most poignant when something, be it money or a good, crosses the border.
Argentina requires exporters to repatriate ALL revenue from sales abroad and convert these funds into the local currency at the official rate. So when soy farmers sell their soy overseas for US dollars, they have 90 days to bring these funds back into the country via the central bank, where they are converted into Argentine pesos at the official rate of ARS $8.73 rather than ARS $13 and up currently being offered on the parallel market. That’s about a 33% difference that exporters lose in an implicit tax.
On top of that, there is a 35% tax on soy exports. So for every dollar worth of soy that exporters sell, they only receive ARS $5.58 in Argentina. That’s a 58% effective tax, or more than half of the value of the product exported.
Not only that, but then those funds are pretty much stuck in Argentina unless the exporter uses bonds to move them back out, whereby they are effectively re-purchasing dollars at ARS $12.50 and up. Not exactly an attractive situation.
Plus, soy exporters everywhere are hurting from the slump in commodity prices. Soy prices have dropped from a high of about US $550 in April to below US $400 per metric ton.
Even in less economically interesting countries, soy producers are looking for ways to protect themselves against this downfall. One of the most basic ways to do this is to hold your product and wait until prices are higher to sell. Farmers can store soy for up to three years in silo bags. Each bag (which look like giant sausages) is 3.4 meters in diameter, 60 meters long, and holds 325 metric tons of soy.
Cristina’s presidency is like a ticking time bomb to capital markets. Investors are snapping up Argentine debt with the understanding that come hell or high water, Cristina is gone in December 2015 and her replacement will repay the holdouts and continue servicing existing debt. Physical soy isn’t exactly like a financial instrument. It is bigger, more costly to store and can rot, but the same idea exists that it will be worth more after her presidency ends. Farmers have hit a point when they can wait – and they will.
Cristina’s conflict with the agriculture industry was front page news for weeks in 2008 when the two squared off and ground the country to a halt. In March 2008, the government decided to raise export taxes on soybeans and sunflower to effectively 44%. Farmers retaliated with roadblocks and thousands of protestors wielding pots and pans that shut down the country. This is essential to understand because it exposed the first fracture in the administration and caused a split between Cristina and her then Vice President Julio Cobos from the Radical Party.
When Cristina ran for reelection in 2007, she chose Cobos as her running mate as a show of bipartisanship and inclusion. When she tried to raise export taxes even higher and the farming sector erupted, the split in the government was exposed for all to see. The bill passed the lower house but when it came to the Senate, it was tied 36 votes in favor and 36 in advance, leaving the final decision to the president of the Senate – Vice President Julio Cobos. Cobos holed up in his office until late into the night while protests thronged the streets, and emerged to say, “may history judge me, my vote is not positive.”
This division dealt a devastating blow to Kirchnerism, marking the first public failure since Cristina’s late husband, the former president Nestor Kirchner, took office in 2003. It also marked the birth of Cristina’s brand of Kirchnerism and an era of harsh capital and import/export controls that arguably are to blame for ripping apart the country’s economy.
There have been reports of graffiti encouraging people to slash open silos and punish these hoarders, and reports have emerged of multiple attempts to destroy these farmers’ crops. Cristina’s administration has not spoken out against these attempts, and has furthered the pressure to force growers to export their crops and put dollars in the government’s coffers by requiring sellers of these silo bags to report their monthly sales to the tax agency AFIP. The government’s argument is that these growers have received state assistance and by hoarding they are undercutting the purpose of these programs.
At the end of the day this is simple. Soy growers see a light at the end of the tunnel and will wait as long as they can. This administration needs dollars, and selling soy abroad would achieve that end.
But for Cristina the clock is ticking. She is leaving behind a divided population and a disastrous economy, but will pull out all the stops to limp across the finish line with at least a few dollars left in the bank. By Bianca Fernet, Argentina.
Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:
Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.
The old-time oligarchs hate people like the Kirchners … too bad.
Pathetic comment. Argentina is a banana republic and Christina is a joke.