Subprime Pump-and-Dump Frenzy Heats Up

Subprime auto loans become triple-A rated structured securities

Investors, driven to near insanity by the Fed’s interest rate repression, have developed an insatiable lust for structured securities backed by subprime auto loans.

Mind you, these are not high-risk securities, as you might be misled to imagine from the name “subprime”; many of them are triple-A rated by none other than venerable Standard & Poor’s, which agreed in early February to pay $1.375 billion to settle with the Department of Justice and 19 state agencies the allegations that it “had engaged in a scheme to defraud investors in structured financial products,” namely slapping triple-A ratings on toxic Mortgage-Backed Securities and Collateralized Debt Obligations in the run-up to the Financial Crisis.

OK, today’s subprime securitization rage is in the auto-loan sector, not mortgages. About 31% of all outstanding auto loan balances are rated subprime. They’re the foundation of booming auto sales. There is a lot to securitize. It’s so hot that private-equity firms are all over it. And IPOs are flying off the shelf.

These auto lenders – from giants such as Ally and GM Financial to smaller ones – are under investigation by the DOJ and a laundry list of other federal and state agencies for the underwriting criteria they used on securitized subprime auto loans as well as the representations and warranties related to these securitizations.

But this isn’t curtailing investors’ insatiable lust for these highly-rated, seemingly low-risk products, and subprime lenders keep pushing them out the door.

Santander Consumer USA, one of the targets of the DOJ investigation, is planning a $1 billion securitization of subprime auto loans. It already issued two securitizations since the DOJ subpoenas last summer, no problem. A $434-million slice of the current deal is rated triple-A by S&P.

In 2011, private-equity firms Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, Centerbridge Partners, and Warburg Pincus bought a 25% stake in the unit from Banco Santander in Spain. In January, they all cashed out part of their investment by selling 75 million shares to the public at $24 a share, raising $1.8 billion in the IPO. Banco Santander sold a 4% stake for a net gain of $1 billion, Bloomberg reported. It still owns 61% of the unit. The PE firms pocketed a partly realized gain of at least 133% on their $1 billion equity investment, including $257 million in cash dividends.

The public wasn’t so lucky. The shares closed on Friday at $22.88, down 4.6% from their IPO price.

Also this week, DriveTime Automotive Group sold $265 million in structured securities based on subprime auto loans, according to Structured Finance News. In November, it had settled with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by agreeing to pay $8 million and changing its debt collection practices, such as not calling delinquent borrowers at work after being told not to.

DriveTime is a privately-held used-vehicle retailer with 126 dealerships across the US, focused on “deep subprime” – consumers with a FICO score of less than 550. About 20% of its customers don’t even have a FICO score. It finances its sales in house and then securitizes the loans.

In its securitization pool this week, 86.3% are loans with terms of 61 months or more, which are riskier than shorter-term loans. A $130-million slice was triple-A rated by S&P, another slice was double-A rated, and the third slice was single-A rated. Risks and investigations, no problem.

Also this week, subprime auto lender CarFinance sold $266 million in structured securities. The least risky slice carried S&P’s single-A rating. Other slices were rated as low as “BB-.” The underlying loans have an average FICO score of 603, pay an annual interest rate of 15%, have a term of 72 months, and sport an average loan-to-value ratio of a dizzying 118%.

These loans should give you the willies. But in the zero interest rate environment imposed by the Fed, investors go for anything that has a discernible yield.

PE firm Perella Weinberg Partners established CarFinance in 2011. Since then, its portfolio has ballooned to $716 million. Last month, Perella merged it with its other subprime auto-loan outfit, Flagship Credit Acceptance. Combined, they originate about $1.2 billion in subprime auto loans a year.

But it’s not easy to make money in this business. Subprime auto lender Exeter Finance, which PE firm Blackstone Group bought in 2011, exploded its portfolio from $150 million to $2.8 billion in three years. It has now become America’s third-largest issuer of subprime auto-loan structured securities. It too received subpoenas from the DOJ and other agencies. And it has been losing money for three years.

American Banker  took a look at a $500-million securitization the company sold last August and found a doozie:

The average APR on those loans was 18.59%. The original term length was 70 months. 75% of these loans had a loan-to-value ratio of over 105%. Eighty-one percent of the borrowers had a FICO score of below 600. And yet some of the securities that these loans are turned into are rated AAA.

Given the hoopla surrounding subprime, American Banker asked Exeter’s new CEO Thomas Anderson if he was thinking about an IPO (despite the losses). “I think it’s probably unlikely in ’15, but I wouldn’t rule it out,” he said.

And has the regulatory scrutiny led to changes inside the company? Well, “probably the only real meaningful, tangible difference is it’s led us to have kind of more people in, I’ll call it the legal department….”

But it has not had any impact on investor enthusiasm, at least not “to date,” Anderson said.

Subprime loans allow the over-indebted, under-paid middle class, the new American proletariat, to buy a car without which they couldn’t go to work, go to the grocery store, or take their kids to the doctor. But these folks are sitting ducks for the industry. Thinking they have no options, they get pushed into overpriced vehicles and – what makes investors’ mouth water – expensive loans.

In face of this boundless investor enthusiasm and blindness to risks, Equifax, which makes its money selling the data it collects on consumers, came out swinging in defense of subprime.

Consumers with deep-subprime FICO scores on average improve their scores after they buy a car and make payments regularly, it said. It didn’t mention the other consumers who default on their usurious subprime loans; they get whacked.

Equifax complained that subprime auto loans were “an all too easy target these days,” though the industry “deserves some recognition for … ultimately helping to pave the way for our recent economic recovery.” A subprime-based economic recovery.

And then it said point-blank, “The Subprime Auto Bubble is Fiction, Not Fact.”

Not a word about the securitization boom and that is stuffing these sliced and diced and repackaged triple-A rated subprime loans into bond funds of unsuspecting conservative investors – because that’s where most of these things end up, and that’s where they can quietly decompose.

New vehicle sales in the US could hit 17 million in 2015, everyone believes. The glory days are back, thanks to subprime. The industry is drunk with its own enthusiasm. Read… Subprime Spikes Auto Sales, Delinquencies Soar, Industry in Total Denial, Fallout to Hit Main Street

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on RedditPrint this pageEmail this to someone

  8 comments for “Subprime Pump-and-Dump Frenzy Heats Up

  1. Vespa P200E
    Feb 21, 2015 at 9:55 am

    Dejavu 2007. The rage back then was securitization of the subprime mortgages “protected” via web of derivatives with ultimate bagholder being the Fannie/Freddie not to mention AIG who was acquired under TARP guise by the Feds to pay off the banksters.

    Roll forward 8 years and same folks are again baited to buy cars they cannot afford (60+ month loan?) with subprime auto loans… It’s easy to repo cars now days via click of button to disable the car vs. old repo man on tow trucks dodging bullets.

    Yep we learn history so as to rinse and repeat it…

    • Mark
      Feb 21, 2015 at 11:24 am

      So true. The Wall St. cancer barely went into remission after the 2008 meltdown before it started metastasizing elsewhere in the host. This won’t end well either.

      • VegasBob
        Feb 21, 2015 at 12:10 pm

        I suspect that one major difference between the 2015 subprime auto loans and the 2005 subprime auto loans is that most of the 2015 vehicles purchased with a subprime loan have a GPS-based ignition shutoff device installed.

        As soon as a borrower is late on a payment, the lender activates the ignition shutoff device and, voila, the car cannot be started until the loan payments are brought current.

        Of course, this process forces deadbeats to prioritize payment of their car loans while presumably stiffing other creditors.

        • David
          Feb 22, 2015 at 3:26 am

          And how many times does the Repo man front up to the signal and find a dying battery and GPS transponder buried in a hole in a vacant lot???

          A lot more than anybody admits.

  2. Michael Gorback
    Feb 21, 2015 at 1:57 pm

    I would like to take this opportunity to announce the IPO of the Gorback Gambling Debt Backed Securities Fund. The current yield is 50%, compounded weekly.

    For further information please contact our Investment Officer Vinny “The Shiv” Buttafuoco or our CEO Jon Corzine at GGDBS@suckers.com

  3. Julian the Apostate
    Feb 21, 2015 at 2:31 pm

    Do you have a phone# for that? Like (201) CARFART? Just checking.

  4. Petunia
    Feb 21, 2015 at 3:19 pm

    The real story here is how the working class is being gouged at every level of the economy. Their wages are depressed which causes every thing they need to be too expensive and then they are ripped off just doing what they need to do to survive. Overpriced cars sold to poor people at exorbitant rates is not a new story, it is a very old story.

  5. Max G
    Feb 22, 2015 at 2:36 am

    But the prices of cars havent rocketed up like of houses during the mortgage crises run-up. So if prices wont crash and cars can be repossessed (which the value of we already know now), are the risks even comparable? Let alone the fact that total value of subprime car loans is far less than mortgages.

Comments are closed.