The Wrath of Draghi: First German Bank Hits Savers with ‘Negative Interest Rates’

Deutsche Skatbank, a division of VR-Bank Altenburger Land, which was founded in 1859, is not the biggest bank in Germany, but it’s the first bank to confirm what German savers have been dreading for a while: the wrath of Draghi.

Retail and business customers with over €500,000 on deposit as of November 1 will earn a “negative interest rate” of 0.25%. In less euphemistic terms, they have to pay 0.25% per annum to the bank for the privilege of handing the bank their hard-earned money or their business cash.

Inflation has had a similar effect in the zero-interest-rate environment that the ECB and other central banks have inflicted on savers, but this time it’s official, it’s open, it can’t be hidden. Instead of lending your moolah to the bank so that the bank can lend it out to businesses and retail customers for all sorts of economically beneficial purposes, you’re financially better off hiding it in the basement. Grudging respect is due the ECB and other central banks: through the perverse regime of ZIRP, they have succeeded in transmogrifying “cash in bank” from an income-producing asset to a costly liability.

“Punishment Interest” is what Germans lovingly call this. It’s the latest and most blatant step of the central-bank strategy to confiscate in bits and pieces and over time the wealth that prudent people and businesses have accumulated, and that should have re-entered the economy via the intermediation of the banks.

Last summer, the ECB imposed negative deposit rates on member banks. At first, it was 0.1%, which has now doubled to 0.2%. The reason? The ECB dragged out its “mandate,” which is, as it said, “to ensure” that “price stability” is “below but close to 2% inflation,” which in turn is “a necessary condition for sustainable growth in the euro area.” Whatever. There is not a scintilla of evidence that inflation is required for economic growth; however, there is plenty of evidence that economic growth can stir up inflation. The good folks at the ECB know this. It’s just the official pretext for using inflation to eat up debt – along with savers.

“There will be no direct impact on your savings,” the ECB announced five months ago. “Only banks that deposit money in certain accounts at the ECB have to pay.” But it added ominously, “Commercial banks may of course choose to lower interest rates for savers.”

And that would be good for savers:

The ECB’s interest rate decisions will in fact benefit savers in the end because they support growth and thus create a climate in which interest rates can gradually return to higher levels.

Thank you hallelujah, ECB, for helping out the savers!

This is in line with its policy, as it says, to “punish savers and reward borrowers.” No kidding. To bring some perspective to it all, it adds, “This behavior is not specific to the ECB; it applies to all central banks.”

Now the wrath of Draghi is hitting German savers and businesses. The first bank is already trying it out. Other banks haven’t yet jumped in line. They’re taking a wait-and-see stance but refuse to exclude the possibility.

“There is no planning in that direction,” Direktbank ING Diba told the Welt.

“We believe that negative interest rates on deposit accounts – whether for private or business customers – are a dangerous signal…” said a spokesman of the German Savings Banks and Giro Association (DSGV). But he did not rule out either that some member banks might not follow the same example in the future.

“The banks will try to avoid negative deposit rates,” explained the Federal Association of German Cooperative Banks, but in this zero-interest-rate environment imposed by the ECB, negative rates on large deposits “cannot be excluded.”

“At the moment, we are not imposing negative interest rates on retail customers,” said the second largest bank in Germany, Commerzbank. At the moment….

“We cannot earnestly rule out punishment interest in the future,” said Frank Kohler, CEO at the Sparda-Bank Berlin, the largest cooperative bank in Germany in terms of membership. He pointed out that the banks that are the most susceptible to punishment interest are those whose business model relies on pure banking with individuals and businesses, and whose earnings cannot be improved by investment banking, risk-taking, gambling, market-rigging, and other big-bank activities that “have triggered the financial crisis in 2007.”

“So precisely those banks suffer the most that have never put the financial system at risk,” he said. “This is unfortunately not free of bitter irony….”

The door to punishment interest has been cracked open. It starts with large deposits and small rates. Then step by step, deposit amounts get smaller and punishment interest rates get larger until everyone gets smacked with it, and no money is save. It’s all part of the time-honored central-bank strategy to flog savers until their mood improves.

Germans don’t get to do this, but the lucky Swiss get to: they get to go to the polls and tell their central bank what to do about gold. A yes-vote will send shock waves through the gold market and other central banks. Read… What the Swiss Gold Referendum Means for Central Banks

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

  8 comments for “The Wrath of Draghi: First German Bank Hits Savers with ‘Negative Interest Rates’

  1. Jackson says:

    So where do I go to get paid to take out a loan?

  2. Dead at 18, buried at 65 says:

    The Germans are very careful and astute about their money. This 0.2% negative interest rate charge is not going to go well with them. Especially, when they do not have to tolerate such low interest rates from other banks. This double of negative interest rate charges will most likely cause an orderly flight from the Deutsche Skatbank. A bank which is risking losing its established customers. Customers, who may decide that all is not well in German’s economy, or elsewhere and who will either move their accounts to other banks or who will convert most of their savings to cash or other physical assets.

    • vimy15 says:

      What a crime … They should buy gold and silver with both hands, leave what little cash they need for day to day affairs … Strangle the bankers, send a message that the Swiss are not the only people who understand sound money.

  3. AC says:

    Sounds like someone wants to force people into equities before they implode, or maybe unload some low-rate bonds onto suckers before rates rise. Perhaps both.

    • Dead at 18, buried at 65 says:

      Absolutely right, I should have thought about that! Fortunately, the Germans are pretty savvy when it comes to money and they are not so, “gambly” and ignorant with their assets as the Anglo Saxons are. That does not mean that they are not ignorant at all, it is just that they are more careful and cautious.

  4. The answer is Bitcoin.

  5. Adam Selene says:

    The politicians/bankers may have got a bit too clever this time. Forced buy ins of insolvent bank stock by depositors is based on the idea that when interest is paid on a deposit in a bank, the depositor is an unsecured creditor. That is, that the deposit is actually a loan to the bank. It is the payment of interest that is the key. When someone pays another to hold his money, that creates an escrow not a loan. The rules for escrows are quite different from loans. The bank becomes a fiduciary for the money. I do not know German law, but in most countries, it cannot be used for high risk loans, credit swaps, derivatives etc. and it sure as heck cannot be used as for a forced buy-in of zombie bank stock. For anyone thinking that banks already charge fees on checking accounts, those are fees for services, processing checks etc., they are not fees for having deposits.
    The lawyers are going to have a lot of fun with this, since as soon as the first “negative interest” is charged, the bank will be liable for breach of its duties. The bank might argue that the “negative interest” is a fee but then it would have to show what service the fee is being charged for.
    Life goes on. Lawyers make money, Incompetent bankers pay themselves undeserved bonuses and dumb as dirt politicians screw things up.

Comments are closed.