Sales of Existing Single-Family Homes Rise but still 23% below 2019, Supply at 2016 Levels. Condo Sales Near Low in the Data, Supply at Housing Bust Levels, Prices Down YoY

September marks third year in a row of sales wobbling along crushed levels.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

Sales of single-family homes that closed in September rose seasonally adjusted by 1.7% from August to an annual rate of 3.69 million homes, according to the National Association of Realtors today.

Compared to the totally crushed September 2024, sales were up by 4.5%. But sales were still down by 23% from September 2019 and by 2% from September 2009, during the depth of the Housing Bust.

September marks the third year in a row that sales of existing single-family homes have wobbled along totally crushed levels (historical data from YCharts):

Sales of condos and co-ops that closed in September were unchanged from the prior month for the third month in a row, at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 370,000 condos, barely up from the record lows in NAR’s condo data going back to 2011.

Compared to the crushed levels of September 2024, sales were flat.

Compared to September 2019, sales were down by 37% (historical data from YCharts):

Lots of supply.

Supply of single-family homes remained unchanged at 4.6 months. Over the past five months, supply has been the highest since Lockdown May 2020, when closed sales had collapsed, and before then the highest since August 2016.

Supply of condos jumped to 6.5 months in September. Over the past four months, supply has been the highest since the Housing Bust.

Supply was about 48% higher than in September 2019:

Condo price drops YoY, single-family home price still up YoY.

The national median price of condos and co-ops dropped 1.6% in September from August, far larger than the typical seasonal drop, to $360,300.

Year-over-year, the price was down by 0.6%

This measure of condo prices had exploded by 43% from mid-2020 through mid-2025, most of it during the two years of mid-2020 to mid-2022.

The national median price of single-family homes fell along seasonal pattern in September to $420,700. Year-over-year, the median price was up by 2.3%.

This measure of the median price of single-family homes had exploded by 47% from June 2020 through June 2025, most of it during the two years of mid-2020 to mid-2022.

June normally marks the seasonal high each year. The index is not seasonally adjusted. The seasonal zigzag is a result of shifts in the mix of what sells, which shifts the median price up or down.

Price action in individual markets differs hugely from the national median.

Price movements and direction differ massively market by market, with prices dropping in some markets and rising in others. A national price index throws all these individual markets into one bucket and calculates the national figure.

Prices have been spiraling down in many markets since 2022. Here are the 15 bigger cities where prices of single-family homes have dropped by 10% to 24% from their peaks. They include Oakland (-24%), Austin (-24%), Cape Coral (-20%), New Orleans (-19%), San Francisco (-16%), etc.. Here is Austin, for example:

And here are the 23 bigger cities where condo prices have dropped by 12% to 28% from their peaks. They include Oakland (-28%), Cape Coral (-28%), Austin (-25%), St. Petersburg (-25%), San Francisco (-16%); Jacksonville (-16%), Tampa (-16%), Denver (-15%), etc.

For example, here is Oakland where prices dropped to the lowest level since December 2015 and are nearly back to the peak of Housing Bubble 1:

But in other markets, prices have only flattened out. And in some big markets, such as New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago, prices are still rising.

The huge Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro, where prices of single-family homes and condos increased by 3.5% year-over-year to a new record – the largest YoY increase of the 33 biggest and expensive metros we track here – forms the opposite end of the spectrum from the Austin metro (-23% from peak) and the San Francisco metro (-11% from peak). Every market dances to its own drummer:

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the mug to find out how:

WOLF STREET FEATURE: Daily Market Insights by Chris Vermeulen, Chief Investment Officer, TheTechnicalTraders.com.

To subscribe to WOLF STREET...

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles by email. It's free.

Join 13.8K other subscribers

  18 comments for “Sales of Existing Single-Family Homes Rise but still 23% below 2019, Supply at 2016 Levels. Condo Sales Near Low in the Data, Supply at Housing Bust Levels, Prices Down YoY

  1. Chunkymunky says:

    Tax all the 3% mortgages. It was a generational handout that never should have happened. That’ll unfreeze the market quick.

    • SoCalBeachDude says:

      How can a debt ever be taxed? What are you smoking?

      • Chunkymunky says:

        Special assesment. The 3% mortgage was a stimulus tool to get people through the pandemic, which is obviously over. Its now lingering on to distort the housing market to an epic degree.

        It’s not that hard buddy. Go back to the beach

        • OutsideTheBox says:

          CM

          What do you want next ? A special new assessment tax on properties that are owned free and clear ?

          Explain how mortgage free properties are different in market consequences from the much maligned 3% mortgage on properties.

        • ShortTLT says:

          We already get taxed on the insane price appreciation that resulted from those 3% mortgages in the form of ever-increasing property taxes.

          No free lunches.

      • Eric86 says:

        Dude either this guy or someone else here came up with the same idea and it is just dumb as hell.

        This isn’t even weed like commenting. This is meth.

    • TSonder305 says:

      On primary residences, I wouldn’t support that. But I absolutely would on rental properties.

    • 2banana says:

      Taxes + insurance + maintenance + HOAs + upkeep + utilities + security + etc.

      Make holding a house, you don’t live in or rent, very expensive despite a 3% mortgage.

      The only time it does make sense is 15% appreciation, year aftet year.

      Which isn’t happening anymore.

      • ApartmentInvestor says:

        @2banana Taxes + insurance + maintenance + HOAs + upkeep + utilities + security + etc. are “already” very expensive and few people (even those without ANY mortgage) let real estate they don’t use or rent sit empty for very long.

    • ApartmentInvestor says:

      @Chunkymunky Should we also tax the guys that bought new Hondas and Chevys with 0% financing?

  2. Michael Engel says:

    In the last 3 years, between June 2022 and June 2025, single family home prices were up 20K, or 1.6% per year. That’s below inflation, insurance,
    taxes, repairs and mortgage rates. Basically, single family home prices
    deflated in real terms.

  3. Phoenix_Ikki says:

    “Compared to the totally crushed September 2024, sales were up by 4.5%.”

    As predicted I am already seeing tons of MSM headlines proclaiming lower rates to the rescue and we are back up baby! The desperation in mainstream to try to get any FOMO demand restart is quite something else .. At least it’s very predictable 🤣

    • Wolf Richter says:

      “and we are back up baby!”

      No, we’re still down by 23% from Sep 2019 and below Sep 2009 during the housing bust, baby!

      And we’re below where we’d been earlier this year when rates were quite a bit higher, baby!

      Look at the chart, baby!

      • Phoenix_Ikki says:

        Haha I know Wolf, when I say we are back up baby! I am channeling mainstream or house humpers BS talking points which they have no problem propagate everywhere.

  4. Mark says:

    I’ve always considered the 30 year fixed rate mortgage as an advantage in the United States. However, now I am wondering if a 25-30 year mortgage that renews the rate every 5 years or so, akin to Canada, is actually a better system. Perhaps it would be more fair so that a certain percentage of the population doesn’t get to lock in at once-in-a-generation interest rates. Looking at Canada, it certainly doesn’t appear to prevent a housing bubble though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *